From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Any consequences to package.mask'ing newer kernels?
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:03:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703311303.41029.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070331055510.GA29960@waltdnes.org>
On Samstag, 31. März 2007, Walter Dnes wrote:
> Partial "df" output before unmerging a bunch of kernels
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda1 11726996 7325372 4401624 63% /
>
>
> Partial "df" output after unmerging a bunch of kernels
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda1 11726996 4183616 7543380 36% /
>
> Yes folks, 3.14 gigs. Having gotten rather tired of doing this
> manually... again... I went into /etc/portage/package.mask and added
>
> >sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r5
>
> It won't hurt me now, but is there anything that might depend on newer
> kernels? It's assumed I'll upgrade when required by a security alert.
> Other than that, how long can I get away between kernel upgrades?
>
besides critical bug fixes, security fixes and driver updates?
IMHO masking never kernels is a really bad idea.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-31 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-31 5:55 [gentoo-user] Any consequences to package.mask'ing newer kernels? Walter Dnes
2007-03-31 8:21 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-04-02 5:02 ` Walter Dnes
2007-04-02 8:37 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-03-31 10:05 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2007-03-31 11:06 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-03-31 11:03 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin [this message]
2007-03-31 16:05 ` b.n.
2007-03-31 14:11 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-04-01 14:21 ` b.n.
2007-04-01 12:48 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-04-01 22:51 ` b.n.
2007-04-01 21:35 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-04-01 22:21 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-04-02 5:35 ` Walter Dnes
2007-04-02 8:38 ` Neil Bothwick
[not found] ` <200704130133.49396.bo.andresen@zlin.dk>
[not found] ` <20070413005947.27416382@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
2007-04-13 0:11 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-04-13 7:40 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-04-16 13:00 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-04-16 13:06 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-04-16 13:48 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-04-13 22:49 ` Anthony E. Caudel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200703311303.41029.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de \
--to=volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox