From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-60475-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1HL4ID-0005fn-AI
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 21:18:57 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l1OLHet4023242;
	Sat, 24 Feb 2007 21:17:40 GMT
Received: from shuttle.zlin.dk (port78.ds1-abs.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.227.17])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l1OLBq1D015816
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 21:11:53 GMT
Received: from BA.zlin.dk (unknown [10.0.0.3])
	by shuttle.zlin.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9436214002
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 22:11:52 +0100 (CET)
From: Bo =?utf-8?q?=C3=98rsted_Andresen?= <bo.andresen@zlin.dk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Bon Echo (why?)
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 22:11:46 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6
References: <45E0970D.7010000@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <45E0970D.7010000@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart3254361.BIhkIPvHko";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200702242211.51631.bo.andresen@zlin.dk>
X-Archives-Salt: d2c96f5a-9bd0-4000-8b4d-2c085188baaf
X-Archives-Hash: f78c45e42d3aa095c50a9fe06c447d7d

--nextPart3254361.BIhkIPvHko
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday 24 February 2007 20:50:37 Gyuszk wrote:
> As you all know, Firefox 2.0.0.2 is stable on x86 in Portage. When one
> emerges it, Gnome menu call, and the software calls itself (in about
> box) Bon Echo (the codename of Firefox 2 development tree). Why?
> Is really development version of Firefox in Portage, or what?

http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/trademarks/faq.html

=2D-=20
Bo Andresen

--nextPart3254361.BIhkIPvHko
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBF4KoX8/kKEzmwNNoRAt3eAJ0ZdyM+6CtKZ1Rs2hAIa/sKCAIhEQCfSrb2
aJ2iB22ng3QfShi5nfEp3DM=
=UfZE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart3254361.BIhkIPvHko--
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list