From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HKjSL-0004SR-8V for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:04:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l1NN2lPG008787; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:02:47 GMT Received: from smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl (smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl [213.51.130.201]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l1NMwJWq003446 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:58:19 GMT Received: from [213.51.130.188] (port=60686 helo=smtp3.groni1.gr.home.nl) by smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1HKmG1-00088H-V5 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 03:03:29 +0100 Received: from cc117081-a.gorre1.fr.home.nl ([217.120.145.240]:51004 helo=manuel.fawlty.mine.nu) by smtp3.groni1.gr.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1HKjIt-00068w-V4 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:54:15 +0100 From: Harm Geerts To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage wants to re-emerge old kernel sources Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:58:15 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <49bf44f10702220616w7e397153m524b2644388603ff@mail.gmail.com> <200702232055.22040.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> <49bf44f10702231446w31468bb8x9a484571ac81608c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <49bf44f10702231446w31468bb8x9a484571ac81608c@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702232358.16535.harmgeerts@home.nl> X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Neem contact op met support@home.nl voor meer informatie X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Archives-Salt: 09b463b5-e035-4ca1-a363-28dbbc3e7c19 X-Archives-Hash: 3006ae671c59757b987c04f6ced56a38 On Friday 23 February 2007, Grant wrote: > > > It is true then that emerge --depclean never unmerges slotted packages? > > > > Just how would portage know that an old slot is no longer needed? Just > > because a newer version is installed doesn't mean it's been compiled or > > that the old is no longer needed (you might need to compile some package > > against the old that fails to compile against the new)... > > > > For the more general case slot deps aren't allowed in the tree yet so > > it's not all that easy to figure out which slots are in use. You do risk > > breaking your system by pruning the wrong package.. > > Ok, yes, slot deps sounds like what I'm after here. Is there a > portage command I can run to see which packages are installed in more > than one slot? I'm having disk space problems on my laptop. emerge -Pp Though you should never run that without --pretend cause that will destroy your system. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list