From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HKCkQ-0004vd-7k for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:08:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l1MC7GxZ023328; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:07:16 GMT Received: from mail.pipni.cz (mail.pipni.cz [193.86.238.3]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l1MC29JO017997 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:02:09 GMT Received: from mail.pipni.cz ([193.86.238.3]:55708 helo=xvalheru.org) id 1HKCeG-0001Eb-E2 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:02:08 +0100 From: "pat" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ramfs - is it necessary ??? Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:02:08 +0100 Message-Id: <20070222120109.M38466@xvalheru.org> In-Reply-To: <200702220411.04512.bss03@volumehost.net> References: <45DCCAED.40709@xvalheru.org> <200702221108.31090.alan@linuxholdings.co.za> <20070222091510.M12110@xvalheru.org> <200702220411.04512.bss03@volumehost.net> X-Mailer: OpenWebMail 2.52 20061019 X-OriginatingIP: 82.113.61.50 (pat@xvalheru.org) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: ac96f87c-6664-4360-a418-9a4acb6ef355 X-Archives-Hash: 350b287ce944f4b6d7ae6db86459e2e3 On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:10:59 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote > On Thursday 22 February 2007, "pat" wrote about > 'Re: [gentoo-user] ramfs - is it necessary ???': > > Only (probably) last question: If I want to play with the Xen I can > > compile SATA support directly to kernel and it will be still OK ??? > > Yes. > Thanks. I'll play with my kernel :-) Pat -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list