[gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins

[gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins

[Jan Stępień]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1392 bytes --]

Hi everyone,



# emerge -avDu world

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating world dependencies |
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "~x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2"
have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
request:
- x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 (masked by: missing keyword)

For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or
refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
(dependency required by "x11-wm/beryl-core-0.1.99.2" [ebuild])

!!! Problem resolving dependencies for x11-wm/emerald
!!! Depgraph creation failed.



Maybe snippets from my /etc/portage/package.* files will be helpful:

keywords

x11-wm/beryl
x11-wm/beryl-core
x11-plugins/beryl-plugins
x11-plugins/beryl-dbus
x11-misc/beryl-manager
x11-misc/beryl-settings

unmask

x11-wm/beryl
x11-wm/beryl-core
x11-plugins/beryl-plugins
x11-plugins/beryl-dbus
x11-plugins/beryl-vidcap
x11-misc/beryl-manager
x11-misc/beryl-settings



I'm not very familiar with unmasking system, so most probably an answer
to the question I'm asking is more than just obvious - if so, accept my
apologies. Nevertheless, I would be grateful for your support.

Best regards,
Jan Stępień

-- 
Mail 	jan at stepien com pl
Jabber 	jano at jabber aster pl
GG 	1894343
Web	http://stepien.com.pl


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins

[Jakob Buchgraber]

Jan Stępień wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> # emerge -avDu world
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating world dependencies |
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "~x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2"
> have been masked.
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
> request:
> - x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 (masked by: missing keyword)
>
> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or
> refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
> (dependency required by "x11-wm/beryl-core-0.1.99.2" [ebuild])
>
> !!! Problem resolving dependencies for x11-wm/emerald
> !!! Depgraph creation failed.
>
>
>
> Maybe snippets from my /etc/portage/package.* files will be helpful:
>
> keywords
>
> x11-wm/beryl
> x11-wm/beryl-core
> x11-plugins/beryl-plugins
> x11-plugins/beryl-dbus
> x11-misc/beryl-manager
> x11-misc/beryl-settings
>
> unmask
>
> x11-wm/beryl
> x11-wm/beryl-core
> x11-plugins/beryl-plugins
> x11-plugins/beryl-dbus
> x11-plugins/beryl-vidcap
> x11-misc/beryl-manager
> x11-misc/beryl-settings
>
>
>
> I'm not very familiar with unmasking system, so most probably an answer
> to the question I'm asking is more than just obvious - if so, accept my
> apologies. Nevertheless, I would be grateful for your support.
>
> Best regards,
> Jan Stępień
>
>   
Hey!

There is one interesting part in the output of emerge
 >> x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 (masked by: missing keyword)
This means that the package hasn't been tested yet.
So you need to replace the following in package.keywords
x11-plugins/beryl-plugins
by
x11-plugins/beryl-plugins ~x86

If you are using another architecture than x86  (like amd64) you need to 
write ~amd64 instead

Cheers,
Jay

-- 
My system configuration (Gentoo Linux): http://www.linux-stats.org/index.php?c=userpage&sys=810
Registered Linux User #373457

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins

[Mick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 873 bytes --]

On Sunday 18 February 2007 13:48, Jakob Buchgraber wrote:
> Jan Stępień wrote:

> > For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page
> > or refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
[snip...]

> There is one interesting part in the output of emerge
>
>  >> x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 (masked by: missing keyword)
>
> This means that the package hasn't been tested yet.
> So you need to replace the following in package.keywords
> x11-plugins/beryl-plugins
> by
> x11-plugins/beryl-plugins ~x86
>
> If you are using another architecture than x86  (like amd64) you need to
> write ~amd64 instead

Before you do any of the above I suggest that you read MASKED PACKAGES section 
and KEYWORDS section within man emerge.  It's better that you understand what 
you are masking/unmasking in the long run and why.

-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins

[Jan Stępień]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 767 bytes --]

Mick napisał(a):
> On Sunday 18 February 2007 13:48, Jakob Buchgraber wrote:
>> Jan Stępień wrote:
> 
>>> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page
>>> or refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
> 
> Before you do any of the above I suggest that you read MASKED PACKAGES section 
> and KEYWORDS section within man emerge.  It's better that you understand what 
> you are masking/unmasking in the long run and why.
> 

I assure you I have read it quite a long time ago. The reason I'm asking
my question here is that the suggestions on emerge's man page weren't
helpful. Neither Google was.

Regards,
Jan Stępień

-- 
Mail 	jan at stepien com pl
Jabber 	jano at jabber aster pl
GG 	1894343
Web	http://stepien.com.pl


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins

[Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 928 bytes --]

On Sunday 18 February 2007, Jakob Buchgraber 
<jakob.buchgraber@googlemail.com> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 
world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins':
> So you need to replace the following in package.keywords
> x11-plugins/beryl-plugins
> by
> x11-plugins/beryl-plugins ~x86

If you are on x86, those two lines mean exactly the same thing in 
package.keywords.

> If you are using another architecture than x86  (like amd64) you need to
> write ~amd64 instead

Or, you could simply leave off the keyword, like he has and have it treated 
like ~${ARCH}, where ${ARCH} is your current architecture.

-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                     ,= ,-_-. =. 
bss03@volumehost.net                      ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy           `-'(. .)`-' 
http://iguanasuicide.org/                      \_/     
New GPG Key!  Old key expires 2007-03-25.  Upgrade NOW!

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins

[Jan Stępień]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1411 bytes --]

Jakob Buchgraber napisał(a):
> Jan Stępień wrote:
>> # emerge -avDu world
>>
>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>>
>> Calculating world dependencies |
>> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "~x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2"
>> have been masked.
>> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
>> request:
>> - x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 (masked by: missing keyword)
>>
>> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man
>> page or
>> refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
>> (dependency required by "x11-wm/beryl-core-0.1.99.2" [ebuild])
>>
>> !!! Problem resolving dependencies for x11-wm/emerald
>> !!! Depgraph creation failed.
>
> There is one interesting part in the output of emerge
>>> x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 (masked by: missing keyword)
> This means that the package hasn't been tested yet.
> So you need to replace the following in package.keywords
> x11-plugins/beryl-plugins
> by
> x11-plugins/beryl-plugins ~x86
> 

I've tried to unmask it with keywords "~x86", "~*", "*" and even "-*"
but still I've got the same error. I'm afraid that * wildcard isn't
working and I can't guess the correct keyword. Have you got any further
suggestions?

Regards,
Jan Stępień


-- 
Mail 	jan at stepien com pl
Jabber 	jano at jabber aster pl
GG 	1894343
Web	http://stepien.com.pl


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins

[Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1275 bytes --]

On Sunday 18 February 2007, Jan Stępień <jan@stepien.com.pl> wrote 
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked 
beryl-plugins':
> >>> x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 (masked by: missing keyword)
>
> I've tried to unmask it with keywords "~x86", "~*", "*" and even "-*"
> but still I've got the same error. I'm afraid that * wildcard isn't
> working and I can't guess the correct keyword. Have you got any further
> suggestions?

I don't have an ebuild for that version on beryl, so I can't tell you what 
keywords can be used.  But, I can tell you how to find out.

e.g.:
$ grep KEYWORD beryl-plugins-0.1.3.ebuild
KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86"

So, you can simply find the KEYWORDS variable in the ebuild you are trying 
to use and add one of those keywords to your package.keywords.  Of course, 
if you do anything other than ~${ARCH}, where ${ARCH} is your current 
architecture and it breaks, you get to keep both pieces.

-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                     ,= ,-_-. =. 
bss03@volumehost.net                      ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy           `-'(. .)`-' 
http://iguanasuicide.org/                      \_/     
New GPG Key!  Old key expires 2007-03-25.  Upgrade NOW!

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins

[Jan Stępień]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 816 bytes --]

Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. napisał(a):
> 
> e.g.:
> $ grep KEYWORD beryl-plugins-0.1.3.ebuild
> KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86"
> 
> So, you can simply find the KEYWORDS variable in the ebuild you are trying 
> to use and add one of those keywords to your package.keywords.  Of course, 
> if you do anything other than ~${ARCH}, where ${ARCH} is your current 
> architecture and it breaks, you get to keep both pieces.
> 

To my surprise, the output is:

KEYWORDS=""

There are... No keywords? I'm puzzled. I'm using x86 architecture.
Should I then edit the ebuild and manually add my arch to KEYWORD
variable? I'm just guessing - maybe it will help somehow.

Regards,
Jan Stępień

-- 
Mail 	jan at stepien com pl
Jabber 	jano at jabber aster pl
GG 	1894343
Web	http://stepien.com.pl


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins

[Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1205 bytes --]

On Monday 19 February 2007, Jan Stępień <jan@stepien.com.pl> wrote 
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked 
beryl-plugins':
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. napisał(a):
> > So, you can simply find the KEYWORDS variable in the ebuild you are
> > trying to use and add one of those keywords to your package.keywords. 
>
> To my surprise, the output is:
>
> KEYWORDS=""
>
> There are... No keywords? I'm puzzled. I'm using x86 architecture.
> Should I then edit the ebuild and manually add my arch to KEYWORD
> variable? I'm just guessing - maybe it will help somehow.

Ah, hrm.  I believe in the future you will be able to accept this package 
by using the special keyword "*", but that doesn't work right now.  I'm 
not sure though.

You could edit the ebuild, but put it in a non-sync'd overlay or it will 
get blown away next time you sync that repository/overlay.

-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                     ,= ,-_-. =. 
bss03@volumehost.net                      ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy           `-'(. .)`-' 
http://iguanasuicide.org/                      \_/     
New GPG Key!  Old key expires 2007-03-25.  Upgrade NOW!

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins

[Bo Ørsted Andresen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 494 bytes --]

On Monday 19 February 2007 15:09:16 Jan Stępień wrote:
> To my surprise, the output is:
>
> KEYWORDS=""
>
> There are... No keywords? I'm puzzled. I'm using x86 architecture.
> Should I then edit the ebuild and manually add my arch to KEYWORD
> variable? I'm just guessing - maybe it will help somehow.

You need to accept ** through package.keywords and you need latest portage 
2.1.2 (which is now stable)...

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160519

-- 
Bo Andresen

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins

[Jan Stępień]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 723 bytes --]

Bo Ørsted Andresen napisał(a):
> On Monday 19 February 2007 15:09:16 Jan Stępień wrote:
>> To my surprise, the output is:
>>
>> KEYWORDS=""
>>
>> There are... No keywords? I'm puzzled. I'm using x86 architecture.
>> Should I then edit the ebuild and manually add my arch to KEYWORD
>> variable? I'm just guessing - maybe it will help somehow.
> 
> You need to accept ** through package.keywords and you need latest portage 
> 2.1.2 (which is now stable)...
> 
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160519
> 

This solves the problem. Thank you very much!

Best regards,
Jan Stępień

-- 
Mail 	jan at stepien com pl
Jabber 	jano at jabber aster pl
GG 	1894343
Web	http://stepien.com.pl


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins

[Mick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1857 bytes --]

On Sunday 18 February 2007 22:19, Jan Stępień wrote:
> Jakob Buchgraber napisał(a):
> > Jan Stępień wrote:
> >> # emerge -avDu world
> >>
> >> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> >>
> >> Calculating world dependencies |
> >> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "~x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2"
> >> have been masked.
> >> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
> >> request:
> >> - x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 (masked by: missing keyword)
> >>
> >> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man
> >> page or
> >> refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
> >> (dependency required by "x11-wm/beryl-core-0.1.99.2" [ebuild])
> >>
> >> !!! Problem resolving dependencies for x11-wm/emerald
> >> !!! Depgraph creation failed.
> >
> > There is one interesting part in the output of emerge
> >
> >>> x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 (masked by: missing keyword)
> >
> > This means that the package hasn't been tested yet.
> > So you need to replace the following in package.keywords
> > x11-plugins/beryl-plugins
> > by
> > x11-plugins/beryl-plugins ~x86
>
> I've tried to unmask it with keywords "~x86", "~*", "*" and even "-*"
> but still I've got the same error. I'm afraid that * wildcard isn't
> working and I can't guess the correct keyword. Have you got any further
> suggestions?

You may want to have a go by adding:

~x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2

or, 

=x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 ~x86  (if you don't want subsequent 
upgrades to unstable packages)

to your /etc/portage/package.keywords file and then run:

# emerge -upDv beryl-plugins 

to see if it is being picked up.  You may discover additional masked 
dependencies at this stage and you will need to unmask them in turn.

HTH
-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage world update fails because of masked beryl-plugins

[Jan Stępień]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1469 bytes --]

Mick napisał(a):
>> # emerge -avDu world
>>
>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>>
>> Calculating world dependencies |
>> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "~x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2"
>> have been masked.
>> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
>> request:
>> - x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 (masked by: missing keyword)
>>
>> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man
>> page or
>> refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
>> (dependency required by "x11-wm/beryl-core-0.1.99.2" [ebuild])
>>
>> !!! Problem resolving dependencies for x11-wm/emerald
>> !!! Depgraph creation failed.
> 
> You may want to have a go by adding:
> 
> ~x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2
> 
> or, 
> 
> =x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.99.2 ~x86  (if you don't want subsequent 
> upgrades to unstable packages)
> 
> to your /etc/portage/package.keywords file and then run:
> 
> # emerge -upDv beryl-plugins 
> 
> to see if it is being picked up.  You may discover additional masked 
> dependencies at this stage and you will need to unmask them in turn.
> 

Thanks for your support. I've tried both options, but unfortunately
either Portage is trying to reemerge the existing version, or it's
displaying the same error message.

Regards,
Jan Stępień

-- 
Mail 	jan at stepien com pl
Jabber 	jano at jabber aster pl
GG 	1894343
Web	http://stepien.com.pl


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]