[gentoo-user] Mails getting lost?

[gentoo-user] Mails getting lost?

[Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 757 bytes --]

Are my mails to the list getting to anyone else?  I'm not seeing them 
myself, and I wanted to make sure they weren't disappearing into the 
ether.  I checked that I could email myself directly, so I don't think 
it's a problem on this side, but I sent a helpful reply about kde-meta and 
kate earlier today and I still haven't seen it yet.  Same with a comment I 
sent to gentoo-desktop around the same time.

Before anyone asks, no, I am not using gmail.

-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                     ,= ,-_-. =. 
bss03@volumehost.net                      ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy           `-'(. .)`-' 
http://iguanasuicide.org/                      \_/     
New GPG Key!  Old key expires 2007-03-25.  Upgrade NOW!

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Mails getting lost?

[John J. Foster]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 823 bytes --]

On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 12:26:46PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> Are my mails to the list getting to anyone else?  I'm not seeing them 
> myself, and I wanted to make sure they weren't disappearing into the 
> ether.  I checked that I could email myself directly, so I don't think 
> it's a problem on this side, but I sent a helpful reply about kde-meta and 
> kate earlier today and I still haven't seen it yet.  Same with a comment I 
> sent to gentoo-desktop around the same time.
> 
Last list mail I have from you is dated 2-2.

festus
-- 
Disobedience, in the eyes of any one who has read history, is man's
original virtue. It is through disobedience that progress has been
made, through disobedience and through rebellion.
                                                     -- Oscar Wilde

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Mails getting lost?

[Michal 'vorner' Vaner]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 970 bytes --]

On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 12:39:56PM -0600, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 12:26 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > Are my mails to the list getting to anyone else?  I'm not seeing them 
> > myself, and I wanted to make sure they weren't disappearing into the 
> > ether.  I checked that I could email myself directly, so I don't think 
> > it's a problem on this side, but I sent a helpful reply about kde-meta and 
> > kate earlier today and I still haven't seen it yet.  Same with a comment I 
> > sent to gentoo-desktop around the same time.
> > 
> > Before anyone asks, no, I am not using gmail.
> > 
> 
> I sent in a post yesterday afternoon.  My mail logs say it was sent, but
> I haven't seen it.  I'm not using gmail either.

I guess this list just does not send the message to its originator, I do
not see mine either.

-- 
When eating an elephant take one bite at a time.
		-- Gen. C. Abrams

Michal 'vorner' Vaner

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Mails getting lost?

[Bo Ørsted Andresen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 382 bytes --]

On Tuesday 06 February 2007 19:26:46 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> [...] but I sent a helpful reply about kde-meta and
> kate earlier today and I still haven't seen it yet.

gmane and I haven't seen that one either... :) Complaints go to bug #141904 
[1]. Logs with mail id's is a requirement though.

[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141904

-- 
Bo Andresen

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Mails getting lost?

[Alan McKinnon]

On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> Are my mails to the list getting to anyone else?  I'm not seeing them
> myself, and I wanted to make sure they weren't disappearing into the
> ether.  I checked that I could email myself directly, so I don't
> think it's a problem on this side, but I sent a helpful reply about
> kde-meta and kate earlier today and I still haven't seen it yet. 
> Same with a comment I sent to gentoo-desktop around the same time.
>
> Before anyone asks, no, I am not using gmail.

Your mails are not getting lost as I do receive copies. I got your 
repsonse to Dale's thread about kate/kwrite at 21:00 local time (GMT 
+2), with the following headers:

Return-Path: 
<gentoo-user+bounces-59608-alan=linuxholdings.co.za@gentoo.org>
X-Original-To: alan@linuxholdings.co.za
Delivered-To: id16_alan@linuxholdings.co.za
X-policyd-weight: using cached result; rate: -8.5
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (lists.gentoo.org [140.105.134.102])
	by linuxholdings.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C73C1AB4197
	for <alan@linuxholdings.co.za>; Tue,  6 Feb 2007 13:28:45 -0600 (CST)
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l16JEf7l011539;
	Tue, 6 Feb 2007 19:14:41 GMT
Delivered-To: <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from ender.volumehost.net 
(adsl-69-154-123-202.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net [69.154.123.202])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l16J5J1F027818
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 19:05:19 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ender.volumehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0DF18551
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue,  6 Feb 2007 19:05:19 +0000 
(UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at volumehost.net
Received: from ender.volumehost.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (ender.volumehost.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 
10024)
	with LMTP id qTC5VGiMM2tu for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Tue,  6 Feb 2007 19:05:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from adsl-69-154-123-205.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net 
(adsl-69-154-123-205.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net [69.154.123.205])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by ender.volumehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530A3184DD
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue,  6 Feb 2007 19:05:17 +0000 
(UTC)
From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss03@volumehost.net>

There doesn't seem to be any significant delay there, beyond 5 minutes 
lag at one point - easily ascribed to a full mail queue or other 
routine causes. But the mail certianly isn't getting lost wholesale.

alan


-- 
Optimists say the glass is half full,
Pessimists say the glass is half empty,
Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be?

Alan McKinnon
alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za
+27 82, double three seven, one nine three five
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list