From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HDD5E-0001dr-5u for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 05:05:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l1353rmL031344; Sat, 3 Feb 2007 05:03:53 GMT Received: from omta01sl.mx.bigpond.com (omta01sl.mx.bigpond.com [144.140.92.153]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l134xtVI026186 for ; Sat, 3 Feb 2007 04:59:56 GMT Received: from oaamta01sl.mx.bigpond.com ([124.191.236.138]) by omta01sl.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20070203045952.OKZS1340.omta01sl.mx.bigpond.com@oaamta01sl.mx.bigpond.com> for ; Sat, 3 Feb 2007 04:59:52 +0000 Received: from wof1 ([124.191.236.138]) by oaamta01sl.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20070203045952.BRTB27396.oaamta01sl.mx.bigpond.com@wof1> for ; Sat, 3 Feb 2007 04:59:52 +0000 From: Rod May To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] 'du' problem after emerge of coreutils Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 15:59:55 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702031559.55912.gentoo-user@rod.net> X-Archives-Salt: 2e7eefa7-013d-4ead-8e5c-8cf1e97d44a0 X-Archives-Hash: d9e0d47fc99b32bbaf9ae9d6ef61351e Hi emerged coreutils up to 6.4 and the '-x' option on du seems broken, e.g.: root> du --version du (GNU coreutils) 5.94 root> du -s -x DVBig Docs.bak Gimp.bak 16730112 DVBig 1935776 Docs.bak 1227584 Gimp.bak so all correct with the old version, these are three simple directories on the one file system. Now emerge to coreutils 6.4... root> du --version du (GNU coreutils) 6.4 root> du -s -x DVBig Docs.bak Gimp.bak 16730112 DVBig 32 Docs.bak 32 Gimp.bak so it seems that for the second and any subsequent arguments treated as on a different file system... eg if I swap the arguments order: root> du -s -x Docs.bak DVBig Gimp.bak 1935776 Docs.bak 32 DVBig 32 Gimp.bak if the -x is not used then the output is correct, (same as 5.94)... thought I would ask here first as I also upgraded most sys related packages just before coreutils...... anyone else get this? Cheers :) Rod May --==========================================================* Random Fortune: All Finagle Laws may be bypassed by learning the simple art of doing without thinking. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list