From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-59416-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1HD2TD-0004pG-E3
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:45:07 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l12HhscI024497;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:43:54 GMT
Received: from shuttle.zlin.dk (port78.ds1-abs.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.227.17])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l12Hdh5A019904
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:39:43 GMT
Received: from BA.zlin.dk (unknown [10.0.0.3])
	by shuttle.zlin.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4324914001
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2007 18:39:43 +0100 (CET)
From: Bo =?iso-8859-1?q?=D8rsted_Andresen?= <bo.andresen@zlin.dk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Precedence order of overlays
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:39:39 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6
References: <200702021532.39245.alan@linuxholdings.co.za> <200702021507.51044.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> <200702021758.47597.alan@linuxholdings.co.za>
In-Reply-To: <200702021758.47597.alan@linuxholdings.co.za>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1745967.IolfV5AQjP";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200702021839.43421.bo.andresen@zlin.dk>
X-Archives-Salt: 6ebbe5a3-85f4-4e5a-a4d6-b4b1c98edd73
X-Archives-Hash: f7c7ce59810946e6d5099b6437e3ec10

--nextPart1745967.IolfV5AQjP
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Friday 02 February 2007 16:58:47 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Do note that portage will consider e.g. foo-20050101.ebuild a higher
> > version than foo-9999.ebuild.
>
> Why is that? Because 20050101 is a bigger number than 9999?

Yes.

=2D-=20
Bo Andresen

--nextPart1745967.IolfV5AQjP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBFw3df8/kKEzmwNNoRArkuAKCd6YjOIa40cKtWrwt9MIjWzLOoGwCfdZsL
Qy+ubQyV+qi2asTNwNr+GWw=
=SDFd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1745967.IolfV5AQjP--
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list