From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1H99ph-00079g-L3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 00:48:18 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l0N0l745004022; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 00:47:07 GMT Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l0N0h0nD031916 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 00:43:00 GMT Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2007 00:43:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO smtp.bensa.ar) [200.125.122.55] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 23 Jan 2007 01:43:00 +0100 X-Authenticated: #9792705 Received: from venkman.bensa.ar (venkman.bensa.ar [192.168.1.200]) by smtp.bensa.ar (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188D91DCDB3; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:42:57 -0300 (ART) From: Norberto Bensa To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] xmule Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:42:56 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <45B54C60.1090609@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <45B54C60.1090609@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6468448.iosuegc1ET"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701222142.56485.nbensa@gmx.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Archives-Salt: 4ad9598e-4e53-475c-84c0-bf046a200af1 X-Archives-Hash: 7e30c310de32af9e170572518af61981 --nextPart6468448.iosuegc1ET Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Iv=E1n P=E9rez Dom=EDnguez wrote: > I was going to update xmule and realized it is not in portage anymore. > I read about the removal in Gentoo Newsletter, but couldn't find any > information nor bugs about this removal. Anyone knows why it was removed? http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D159503 Regards, Norberto --nextPart6468448.iosuegc1ET Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFtVoQuW4an9W1spIRAv3OAJ9j4VLKh8XN67byvUUCpRIyzAFYSwCfdw+8 dPRwzqpcwUp+vyZ60ZuRkzo= =Rbw5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6468448.iosuegc1ET-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list