public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bo Ørsted Andresen" <bo.andresen@zlin.dk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Packages from overlays
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 07:47:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200701130747.15940.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45A87BFE.5000300@exceedtech.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1379 bytes --]

I've gotten this mail twice now.

On Saturday 13 January 2007 07:28, Dale wrote:
> Kent Fredric wrote:
> > It would appear google has updated their package without changing the
> > name, and portage has not been notified of this change.

It's the other way around. He gets a digest verification error *because* 
portage was notified. The old ebuild gets removed because it's tarball is now 
unavailable upstream (and a new is available under the same name).

[SNIP]
> > and that should fix you up. I found it still compiles and runs fine
> > *shrugs*

Not much of a fix. Just gets the old version. Of course it still compiles and 
runs. It hasn't changed at all.

[SNIP]
> While I know that it comes from Google and I don't question the tarball from
> a security point of view, portage still complains about it each time and
> deletes it for me, since it thinks it is a security problem.  That would
> normally be a great idea but then I have to download it again, which takes a
> little over two hours for me. I get about 10Mbs a hour here.
[SNIP]

I can't help wondering. If you don't have the bandwidth to upgrade when there 
is an upgrade. How useful is googleearth to you then. It's not like it 
doesn't require any bandwidth just to run... Also the more often you sync the 
more bandwidth you need with Gentoo in general..

-- 
Bo Andresen

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-13  6:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-13  0:49 [gentoo-user] Packages from overlays Willie Wong
2007-01-13  4:15 ` Dale
2007-01-13  4:27   ` Kent Fredric
2007-01-13  6:28     ` Dale
2007-01-13  6:47       ` Bo Ørsted Andresen [this message]
2007-01-13  7:28         ` Dale
2007-01-13  5:03   ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-01-13  4:22 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-01-13  4:57   ` [gentoo-user] " »Q«
2007-01-13  5:09   ` [gentoo-user] " Willie Wong
2007-01-13  6:04     ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-01-13 12:31 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-01-13 17:30   ` Willie Wong
2007-01-13 20:48     ` Neil Bothwick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200701130747.15940.bo.andresen@zlin.dk \
    --to=bo.andresen@zlin.dk \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox