From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1H5bAh-0003Ke-MX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:11:16 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l0D58Wrf026948; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:08:32 GMT Received: from shuttle.zlin.dk (port78.ds1-abs.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.227.17]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0D53gGO020552 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:03:42 GMT Received: from BA.zlin.dk (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by shuttle.zlin.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A4E30037 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 06:03:42 +0100 (CET) From: Bo =?iso-8859-1?q?=D8rsted_Andresen?= To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Packages from overlays Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 06:03:35 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20070113004916.GA9243@princeton.edu> <45A85CE0.70707@exceedtech.net> In-Reply-To: <45A85CE0.70707@exceedtech.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2596238.XjOzEVMkby"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701130603.41823.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> X-Archives-Salt: fb1812a9-8c7d-4be5-b45e-5f1017f91845 X-Archives-Hash: 6699bdc5f482c4d19a39db7a91af0cfc --nextPart2596238.XjOzEVMkby Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Doesn't really seem to be related to OPs question so it probably should hav= e=20 been a new thread, however... On Saturday 13 January 2007 05:15, Dale wrote: [SNIP] > From what I understand Google doesn't allow Gentoo to mirror the souce > tarball. =A0After you install it and sync later on, if Google has changed > something, you get a digest error. The real issue is that google refuse to rename the tarball when they releas= e a=20 new version. The secondary issue is then that Gentoo can't rename it on the= ir=20 own mirros since they aren't allowed to redistribute it. > It will delete the tarball from distfiles too. Without your consent?? > I'm on dial-up and that sort of ticks me off,=20 Understandable. You should, however, realize that it is an actual upgrade=20 you're rejecting in this case. > The way I got around it is to manually delete it from my world file. > That way it doesn't check the digest. =A0Some guru may have a better way > to do this but this is what I have ran into with googleearth. =A0May want > to check farther before you run into the same thing I did. I don't really have a better suggestion if you don't want the upgrades.=20 Redigesting it as Kent suggests seems rather pointless as you would just be= =20 reinstalling the old version (while tricking portage into believing you get= =20 the newer version (as if that mattered ;)) with no actual gain. =2D-=20 Bo Andresen --nextPart2596238.XjOzEVMkby Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFqGgt8/kKEzmwNNoRAla2AKCzWBtMXByhFEqwToq5K1wzSMZwVgCfcqSR TD73Wf/Wjo9iOnD/PcIoQVE= =JE3Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2596238.XjOzEVMkby-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list