From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1H1mcw-0003zq-1w for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 16:36:38 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l02GYWj0026051; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:34:32 GMT Received: from anli.goldspace.net ([80.246.67.229]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l02GWWVQ008908 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:32:32 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by anli.goldspace.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BC45A665 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:32:41 +0300 (MSK) From: Andrew Gaydenko To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] gnupg upgraded, problems arised Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:32:41 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200612291320.35075@goldspace.net> <200701021010.32072.bss03@volumehost.net> In-Reply-To: <200701021010.32072.bss03@volumehost.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701021932.41735@goldspace.net> X-Archives-Salt: ddbc538d-9c4d-47a9-9d52-4d63d39b8469 X-Archives-Hash: fd17b3193cdc0289f4df097eeaf7abf8 I have masked 2.x version as need to work. I'm not pgp guru and wil wait for other's opinions. ======= On Tuesday 02 January 2007 19:10, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: ======= On Friday 29 December 2006 04:20, Andrew Gaydenko wrote about '[gentoo-user] [OT] gnupg upgraded, problems arised': > After yesterday syncing (~amd64) gnupg package was upgraded (and > de-slotted). Now - via KMail, KGpg, gpg CLI - my long-used password > suddenly become a 'bad passphrase'. I have tried reimport keys without > any success. Any news on this? I'd like to upgrade to gnupg-2.0*, but I don't want to lose access to my existing keys. Does a bug exist? /me goes bug searching. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list