From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1H1OfL-0000kA-1o for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:01:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l01Ex47M010897; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 14:59:04 GMT Received: from mta-fe.casema.nl (cas-mta2-fe.casema.nl [83.80.1.24]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l01Ev128009512 for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 14:57:01 GMT Received: from localhost (cas-filter1.mgmt.casema.nl [10.42.32.68]) by mta-fe.casema.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573784FCE for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 15:57:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from mta-fe.casema.nl ([10.42.32.24]) by localhost (cas-filter1.mgmt.casema.nl [10.42.32.211]) (amavisd-new, port 20024) with ESMTP id 31257-01 for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 15:57:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from 535150d6.cable.casema.nl (535150D6.cable.casema.nl [83.81.80.214]) by mta-fe.casema.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383854FBF for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 15:57:01 +0100 (CET) From: Rudmer van Dijk To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild / missing ebuild Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 15:57:02 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200701011616.26753.uwix@iway.na> In-Reply-To: <200701011616.26753.uwix@iway.na> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701011557.02612.rudmer.van.dijk@casema.nl> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at casema.nl X-Archives-Salt: b5a90ad7-1232-4143-8d59-56861ed59992 X-Archives-Hash: 585db4c0978080a9673033b044383edb Hi, On Monday 01 January 2007 15:16, Uwe Thiem wrote: > revdep-rebuild produces a long list of binaries to be rebuilt. Not wuite > surprising since I haven't done it on that box for a long while. > > Problem is it tells me that at least for one binary no ebuild exists but it > doesn't tell me which binary. Bummer! How do I find out? you can try `eix-test-obsolete` that will display inconsistencies all over the place, as well as installed packages which does not exist anymore. Rudmer -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list