From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GwzWE-0003DO-2n for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:21:54 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kBKBIZlB014681; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:18:35 GMT Received: from ender.volumehost.net (adsl-69-154-123-202.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net [69.154.123.202]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBKBEoA8030417 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:14:50 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ender.volumehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8E9148F1 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:14:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at volumehost.net Received: from ender.volumehost.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ender.volumehost.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 946RMZolQXTz for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from adsl-69-154-123-205.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net (adsl-69-154-123-205.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net [69.154.123.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ender.volumehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D26148EE for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:14:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo healthy? Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:14:48 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <49bf44f10612180647g6ac243ebm9cfa8b79a5aeb3b5@mail.gmail.com> <20061220094347.6f93d0f8@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> <200612201246.21157.uwix@iway.na> In-Reply-To: <200612201246.21157.uwix@iway.na> X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5129612.jEhCv1NC6D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200612200514.48935.bss03@volumehost.net> X-Archives-Salt: be5cfcfa-0695-4373-9859-cc2636556220 X-Archives-Hash: d93618570a5a53cbc32f1080fb18650b --nextPart5129612.jEhCv1NC6D Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 20 December 2006 04:46, Uwe Thiem wrote=20 about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo healthy?': > On 20 December 2006 11:43, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > Or do what Ubuntu did and default all installs to use their time > > server, they can get a good estimate of the number of users from the > > time server logs. > > Well, wouldn't work at least here. All my installs at customers point to > a nearby timeserver. ;-) Same here; I configure my ntp clients to know the servers on the LAN, and=20 all the ones along the traceroute to ntp..net and=20 ntp..net as well as one from the US pool. =2D-=20 "If there's one thing we've established over the years, it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest clue what's best for them in terms of package stability." =2D- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh --nextPart5129612.jEhCv1NC6D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFiRsoq72nDbhDXToRAiI+AJ46I+XR7OUDNIcMykTAx9l2sh+QqgCeLQMu 2XaXWObnlCBUud/r+RKDrXc= =8SZZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5129612.jEhCv1NC6D-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list