From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GwlPa-0005W2-Ps for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:18:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kBJKFj16028380; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:15:45 GMT Received: from ender.volumehost.net (adsl-69-154-123-202.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net [69.154.123.202]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBJKDFqb010792 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:13:16 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ender.volumehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C43FFEB for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:13:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at volumehost.net Received: from ender.volumehost.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ender.volumehost.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9dngmTZVT5IQ for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from adsl-69-154-123-205.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net (adsl-69-154-123-205.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net [69.154.123.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ender.volumehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C21C14878 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:13:14 +0000 (UTC) From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:13:08 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200612191336.57134.bss03@volumehost.net> In-Reply-To: X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1210587.Iv6ZWxUcdk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200612191413.14259.bss03@volumehost.net> X-Archives-Salt: 02406e31-302a-4649-abd9-9e525e119e33 X-Archives-Hash: ef0836104f1843267bfb1b582fa3bf94 --nextPart1210587.Iv6ZWxUcdk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:48, Jakob wrote= =20 about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo': > Thaks for the quick reply. > On http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags they say for 32bit use: > CFLAGS=3D"-march=3Dprescott -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer" > Is this wat you meant for better -march settings? Specifically, I meant that -march=3Dprescott is probably better=20 than -march=3Dpentium-m. If you use Konqueror, hit ; or just use your favorite infotext reader to look at the= =20 x86(_64) machine specific options, so you are generating code tuned=20 particularly to your processor. > I was confused by the GWN because they didnt say its for 64bit only. Well, a lot of people assume that buying a 64-bit processor means you=20 actually want to use the extra bits (and registers). Of course, it's=20 getting harder and harder to buy a non-64 bit chip. =2D-=20 "If there's one thing we've established over the years, it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest clue what's best for them in terms of package stability." =2D- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh --nextPart1210587.Iv6ZWxUcdk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFiEfaq72nDbhDXToRAoeSAJ4hDuFlHvUfeSh+HvkZE6TsRM1MYACfRQdF FdwekGlyytNZjmX6wC6u2VA= =wU8l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1210587.Iv6ZWxUcdk-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list