From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GeqN8-0006SK-FE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:57:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k9V9tKhP011295; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:55:20 GMT Received: from smtp1.iway.na (smtp1.iway.na [196.44.136.15]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9V9qjTW030469 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:52:46 GMT Received: from vscan.iway.na (vscan.iway.na [196.44.136.13]) by smtp1.iway.na (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEEE06462 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:52:41 +0200 (WAST) Received: from mx2.iway.na (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vscan.iway.na (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867C88B1F7 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:52:43 +0200 (WAST) Received: from uwix.alt.na ([196.44.156.41]) by mx2.iway.na (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id J7ZVFV03.J5Z for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:52:43 +0200 Received: from uwe by uwix.alt.na with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GepXN-0008Lv-Qd for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:04:01 +0200 From: Uwe Thiem Organization: SysEx (Pty) Ltd. To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] BIG reiserfs problem Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:04:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <45466541.4000404@megahappy.net> <200610310917.48293.alan@linuxholdings.co.za> In-Reply-To: <200610310917.48293.alan@linuxholdings.co.za> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610311104.01802.uwix@iway.na> Sender: Uwe Thiem X-Archives-Salt: c210fa45-3d95-4a50-a68c-11f7c95039b3 X-Archives-Hash: 3ff91e7a6931692429d3808249ca9230 On 31 October 2006 09:17, Alan McKinnon wrote: > I find it useful to keep in mind that XFS is a file-system (i.e. a > system for files), and not necessarily a severly disk-bound filesystem Would you mind to elaborate on this? I simply do not get your point. Uwe -- Mark Twain: I rather decline two drinks than a German adjective. http://www.SysEx.com.na -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list