From: Alan McKinnon <alan@linuxholdings.co.za>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] X USE flag
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:22:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200610301822.33999.alan@linuxholdings.co.za> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610301412410.27291@tragbb.ehf.hav-fghggtneg.qr>
On Monday 30 October 2006 15:21, Sascha Lucas wrote:
> > Forgive my saying this, but that is a stupendous waste of my cpu
> > cycles and time. A better solution must exist - if this moves to
> > arch unchanged the gentoo user base will go ballistic
>
> from portage pkg_postinst:
> ----------
> In portage-2.1.1, emerge --newuse is now sensitive to changes in
> IUSE. Immediately after upgrade from 2.1, users may notice a
> significantly larger number of packages pulled in by --newuse, but
> that behavior is normal. For additional information regarding this
> change, please see bugs #116955, #144333, #144661, and #146060.
> ----------
>
> I recommend to burdening @ #116955, or helping @ #144333 :-)
I read all those bugs and comments, especially this one:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144333#c6
and it seems that we have a trade-off here - put up with the occasional
redundant remerge, or put up with the mostly constant nuisance of yet
another option to emerge and the decision process that goes with it -
to use or not to use this new option.
On balance, maybe the former is the route of least pain
alan
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-30 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-30 10:01 [gentoo-user] X USE flag Alan McKinnon
2006-10-30 12:02 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2006-10-30 13:04 ` Alan McKinnon
2006-10-30 13:21 ` Sascha Lucas
2006-10-30 16:22 ` Alan McKinnon [this message]
2006-10-30 18:38 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2006-10-30 18:48 ` Hans de Hartog
2006-10-30 19:41 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2006-10-31 7:13 ` Alan McKinnon
2006-10-31 8:30 ` Neil Bothwick
2006-11-01 17:57 ` Mark Shields
2006-11-01 20:23 ` Neil Bothwick
2006-11-01 20:36 ` Mark Shields
2006-11-01 22:12 ` Mrugesh Karnik
2006-10-30 19:46 ` Hans de Hartog
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200610301822.33999.alan@linuxholdings.co.za \
--to=alan@linuxholdings.co.za \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox