From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Gd8Xd-0002VG-B4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:57:17 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k9QGq83U016147; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:52:08 GMT Received: from shuttle.zlin.dk (port78.ds1-abs.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.227.17]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9QGnUAd007088 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:49:31 GMT Received: from BA.zlin.dk (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by shuttle.zlin.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F1D30037 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:49:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Bo =?iso-8859-1?q?=D8rsted_Andresen?= To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge Tomcat Problem Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:49:21 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <453E0F32.1070804@akyasociados.com.ar> <200610261749.54982.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> <4540B71A.7060006@akyasociados.com.ar> In-Reply-To: <4540B71A.7060006@akyasociados.com.ar> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6400786.KZGA8XD6zX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200610261849.27849.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> X-Archives-Salt: 77901e42-dbcc-4712-b3a0-cc6acecb3b39 X-Archives-Hash: 2514727d310aeac3990dd082381c2a31 --nextPart6400786.KZGA8XD6zX Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 26 October 2006 15:24, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote: > As a matter of fact, i did not, and i dont get it, since is not a common > thing for me to miss mails. Anyway, i apologize if i disrespected your > effort to help me :P Heh, it seems to happen quite often.. [SNIP] > Current make.profile symlink: > /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/amd64/2006.0 > > and i checked and yes, nss is installed in /usr/lib64/nss, should i make > a symlink (/usr/lib/nss -> /usr/lib64/nss) ? [SNIP] That will solve the immediate issue, yes. The bigger issue, however, is tha= t=20 on that profile /usr/lib should have been a symlink to /usr/lib64. $ ls -ld /usr/lib lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 5 2006-02-22 23:12 /usr/lib -> lib64 =2D-=20 Bo Andresen --nextPart6400786.KZGA8XD6zX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFQOcX8/kKEzmwNNoRAgf4AJ9NlcaJao3O5ZZA4EiEj1Whal6SCgCeOyd+ 7u+/Mlg8MYMpJvDf+tI6DaA= =7azG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6400786.KZGA8XD6zX-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list