public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?
@ 2006-10-18  3:37 maxim wexler
  2006-10-18  3:43 ` maxim wexler
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: maxim wexler @ 2006-10-18  3:37 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Hello group,

I recently sync'ed portage, but when I did #emerge
digg2ogg it installed version 0.8 which is way out of
date. 

I thought sync was supposed to "prime" portage to get
the latest versions of software when needed.

Here's the sync line in make.conf.

SYNC="rsync://rsync.namerica.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"

Perhaps I should be adding more? Replace with
something else?

-Maxim

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?
  2006-10-18  3:37 maxim wexler
@ 2006-10-18  3:43 ` maxim wexler
  2006-10-18  3:44 ` Brett I. Holcomb
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: maxim wexler @ 2006-10-18  3:43 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

>digg2ogg

should be dir2ogg


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?
  2006-10-18  3:37 maxim wexler
  2006-10-18  3:43 ` maxim wexler
@ 2006-10-18  3:44 ` Brett I. Holcomb
  2006-10-18  3:46 ` Brett I. Holcomb
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Brett I. Holcomb @ 2006-10-18  3:44 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On Tuesday October 17 2006 23:37, maxim wexler wrote:
> Hello group,
>
> I recently sync'ed portage, but when I did #emerge
> digg2ogg it installed version 0.8 which is way out of
> date.
>
> I thought sync was supposed to "prime" portage to get
> the latest versions of software when needed.
>
> Here's the sync line in make.conf.
>
> SYNC="rsync://rsync.namerica.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
>
> Perhaps I should be adding more? Replace with
> something else?
>
> -Maxim
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com

-- 

Brett I. Holcomb
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?
  2006-10-18  3:37 maxim wexler
  2006-10-18  3:43 ` maxim wexler
  2006-10-18  3:44 ` Brett I. Holcomb
@ 2006-10-18  3:46 ` Brett I. Holcomb
  2006-10-18  3:56 ` Drew
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Brett I. Holcomb @ 2006-10-18  3:46 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Are newer versions masked for some reason?  When a sync is done it gets all 
the mirror has.


On Tuesday October 17 2006 23:37, maxim wexler wrote:
> Hello group,
>
> I recently sync'ed portage, but when I did #emerge
> digg2ogg it installed version 0.8 which is way out of
> date.
>
> I thought sync was supposed to "prime" portage to get
> the latest versions of software when needed.
>
> Here's the sync line in make.conf.
>
> SYNC="rsync://rsync.namerica.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
>
> Perhaps I should be adding more? Replace with
> something else?
>
> -Maxim
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com

-- 

Brett I. Holcomb
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?
  2006-10-18  3:37 maxim wexler
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-10-18  3:46 ` Brett I. Holcomb
@ 2006-10-18  3:56 ` Drew
  2006-10-18  4:00 ` Darren Kirby
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Drew @ 2006-10-18  3:56 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

> I thought sync was supposed to "prime" portage to get
> the latest versions of software when needed.

All sync does is download the latest ebuilds into your local portage
tree. If the ebuild maintainers haven't gotten around to creating an
ebuild for package 'foo-1.2.0' (the lastest) and are still using
'foo-0.8' then you're stuck with 'foo-0.8' unless you roll your own
ebuild for 'foo-1.2.0'.

Of course you're also welcome to submit the custom ebuild into
bugzilla to get it included in portage for everyone else to benefit
from.


-Andrew Kay
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?
  2006-10-18  3:37 maxim wexler
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-10-18  3:56 ` Drew
@ 2006-10-18  4:00 ` Darren Kirby
  2006-10-18 21:02   ` maxim wexler
  2006-10-18  8:01 ` Neil Bothwick
  2006-10-19 10:04 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: " Alexander Skwar
  6 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Darren Kirby @ 2006-10-18  4:00 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Quoth the maxim wexler
> Hello group,
>
> I recently sync'ed portage, but when I did #emerge
> digg2ogg it installed version 0.8 which is way out of
> date.
>
> I thought sync was supposed to "prime" portage to get
> the latest versions of software when needed.
>
> Here's the sync line in make.conf.
>
> SYNC="rsync://rsync.namerica.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
>
> Perhaps I should be adding more? Replace with
> something else?
>
> -Maxim

Hi Max,

I put in a bug request for a version bump and to make a newer version stable, 
but it has not been done yet. What you can do for now is:

# echo "media-sound/dir2ogg ~x86" >> /etc/portage/package.keywords

and that will install dir2ogg-0.9.1.

Note: that is _still_ a couple versions behind the upstream stable version 
which is 0.9.3. If you need the newer features you may just want to grab the 
package from http://badcomputer.org/unix/dir2ogg and install manually. If you 
want to keep it in portage, you can set up an overlay (read portage guide for 
instructions on this) and simply copy the 0.9.1 ebuild to the overlay, change 
the name to 'dir2ogg-0.9.3.ebuild', digest it, and install as usual...

-d
-- 
darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org
"...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..."
- Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?
  2006-10-18  3:37 maxim wexler
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-10-18  4:00 ` Darren Kirby
@ 2006-10-18  8:01 ` Neil Bothwick
  2006-10-19 10:04 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: " Alexander Skwar
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2006-10-18  8:01 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 389 bytes --]

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:37:04 -0700 (PDT), maxim wexler wrote:

> I thought sync was supposed to "prime" portage to get
> the latest versions of software when needed.

The latest versions AVAILABLE. As has been said so many times, search
bugzilla first - http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147360


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Conclusion: the place where you got tired of thinking.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?
  2006-10-18  4:00 ` Darren Kirby
@ 2006-10-18 21:02   ` maxim wexler
  2006-10-18 21:35     ` Darren Kirby
                       ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: maxim wexler @ 2006-10-18 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

> # echo "media-sound/dir2ogg ~x86" >>
> /etc/portage/package.keywords
> 
> and that will install dir2ogg-0.9.1.

Not yet. There's gotta be more to it than that.

I ran the above command then did #emerge -C dir2ogg
then #emerge -pv dir2ogg:

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild  N    ] media-sound/dir2ogg-0.8  0 kB


>From man make.conf there is this, the only mention of
/etc/portage:

suidctl
    Before merging packages to the live filesystem,
automatically strip setuid bits from any file that is
not listed in /etc/portage/suidctl.conf.

So, if portage is supposed to read package.keywords I
don't know where the link would be made.

-Maxim


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?
  2006-10-18 21:02   ` maxim wexler
@ 2006-10-18 21:35     ` Darren Kirby
  2006-10-19  0:06       ` maxim wexler
  2006-10-19 10:09       ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
  2006-10-18 21:49     ` Daniel Barkalow
                       ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 2 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Darren Kirby @ 2006-10-18 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Quoth the maxim wexler
> > # echo "media-sound/dir2ogg ~x86" >>
> > /etc/portage/package.keywords
> >
> > and that will install dir2ogg-0.9.1.
>
> Not yet. There's gotta be more to it than that.
>
> I ran the above command then did #emerge -C dir2ogg
> then #emerge -pv dir2ogg:
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebuild  N    ] media-sound/dir2ogg-0.8  0 kB
>
> >From man make.conf there is this, the only mention of
>
> /etc/portage:
>
> suidctl
>     Before merging packages to the live filesystem,
> automatically strip setuid bits from any file that is
> not listed in /etc/portage/suidctl.conf.
>
> So, if portage is supposed to read package.keywords I
> don't know where the link would be made.

It is built into 'emerge' AFAIK...

You have made a typo or some other mistake. It is documented in the portage 
guide: 
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=3&chap=3#doc_chap2

Again, ensure that you have the line:

media-sound/dir2ogg ~x86

in "/etc/portage/package.keywords"

Note that this assumes you are running "x86" ARCH. If you are using a 
different arch then do the same thing but change the arch to what you are 
using: ie: "~sparc", "~ppc", or "~amd64".

-d
-- 
darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org
"...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..."
- Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?
  2006-10-18 21:02   ` maxim wexler
  2006-10-18 21:35     ` Darren Kirby
@ 2006-10-18 21:49     ` Daniel Barkalow
  2006-10-18 21:50     ` Neil Bothwick
  2006-10-19  0:21     ` b.n.
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Barkalow @ 2006-10-18 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, maxim wexler wrote:

> I ran the above command then did #emerge -C dir2ogg
> then #emerge -pv dir2ogg:
> 
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> 
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebuild  N    ] media-sound/dir2ogg-0.8  0 kB

If you try "emerge -pv '>dir2ogg-0.8'", it will tell you why it isn't 
going to install each of the later versions.

> From man make.conf there is this, the only mention of
> /etc/portage:

You want the portage man page; make.conf only documents those things 
actually in make.conf, not the various other config files. Also, the emrge 
man page will tell you relevant things.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?
  2006-10-18 21:02   ` maxim wexler
  2006-10-18 21:35     ` Darren Kirby
  2006-10-18 21:49     ` Daniel Barkalow
@ 2006-10-18 21:50     ` Neil Bothwick
  2006-10-19  0:21     ` b.n.
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2006-10-18 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 286 bytes --]

On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:02:02 -0700 (PDT), maxim wexler wrote:

> From man make.conf there is this, the only mention of
> /etc/portage:

man portage


-- 
Neil Bothwick

If someone with multiple personalities threatens to kill himself, is it
considered a hostage situation?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?
  2006-10-18 21:35     ` Darren Kirby
@ 2006-10-19  0:06       ` maxim wexler
  2006-10-19 10:09       ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: maxim wexler @ 2006-10-19  0:06 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

> You have made a typo or some other mistake. It is
> documented in the portage 
> guide: 

Oops, I left off the 'x' in '~x86'

So that's sorted now. Thanks Darren.

-Maxim

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?
  2006-10-18 21:02   ` maxim wexler
                       ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-10-18 21:50     ` Neil Bothwick
@ 2006-10-19  0:21     ` b.n.
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: b.n. @ 2006-10-19  0:21 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

maxim wexler ha scritto:
>> # echo "media-sound/dir2ogg ~x86" >>
>> /etc/portage/package.keywords
>>
>> and that will install dir2ogg-0.9.1.
> 
> Not yet. There's gotta be more to it than that.
 >
> I ran the above command then did #emerge -C dir2ogg
> then #emerge -pv dir2ogg:
> 
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> 
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebuild  N    ] media-sound/dir2ogg-0.8  0 kB

You probably didn't execute the previous command correctly. If I run 
"eix dir2ogg" that's the output:

* media-sound/dir2ogg
      Available versions:  0.8 ~0.9.1 ~0.9.2
      Installed:           none
      Homepage:            http://badcomputer.org/linux/dir2ogg/
      Description:         Converts MP3, M4A, and WAV files to OGG format.

This means that 0.9.1 and 0.9.2 are masked by ~.
The only really correct way to emerge these packages is to add them to 
package.keywords, as explained in the handbook.

 > So, if portage is supposed to read package.keywords I
 > don't know where the link would be made.

About /etc/portage/package.keywords:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=3&chap=3#doc_chap2

Go here and have a (small) read.
You'll find that probably you're doing something wrong on your side.

m.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?
  2006-10-18 21:35     ` Darren Kirby
  2006-10-19  0:06       ` maxim wexler
@ 2006-10-19 10:09       ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
  2006-10-19 18:23         ` Darren Kirby
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Bo Ørsted Andresen @ 2006-10-19 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 507 bytes --]

On Wednesday 18 October 2006 23:35, Darren Kirby wrote:
> Again, ensure that you have the line:
>
> media-sound/dir2ogg ~x86
>
> in "/etc/portage/package.keywords"
>
> Note that this assumes you are running "x86" ARCH. If you are using a
> different arch then do the same thing but change the arch to what you are
> using: ie: "~sparc", "~ppc", or "~amd64".

Actually it doesn't assume anything. It simply means that you accept any 
package that includes the ~x86 keyword..

-- 
Bo Andresen

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?
@ 2006-10-19 14:35 Eric Bohn
  2006-10-19 14:57 ` Neil Bothwick
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Eric Bohn @ 2006-10-19 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

The use of package.keywords is recommended because it allows you to apply the condition to specific packages.  If you really want to use the arch testing packages system wide, then I believe the way to do this is to insert the line:

ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"

into your /etc/make.conf file.  All subsequent emerges will then make use of the test package versions for the specified arch.  However, this is not recommended as it tends to produce an unstable system.

----- Original Message ----
From: BoØrsted Andresen <bo.andresen@zlin.dk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 6:09:37 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?


On Wednesday 18 October 2006 23:35, Darren Kirby wrote:
> Again, ensure that you have the line:
>
> media-sound/dir2ogg ~x86
>
> in "/etc/portage/package.keywords"
>
> Note that this assumes you are running "x86" ARCH. If you are using a
> different arch then do the same thing but change the arch to what you are
> using: ie: "~sparc", "~ppc", or "~amd64".

Actually it doesn't assume anything. It simply means that you accept any 
package that includes the ~x86 keyword..

-- 
Bo Andresen



-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?
  2006-10-19 14:35 [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync? Eric Bohn
@ 2006-10-19 14:57 ` Neil Bothwick
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2006-10-19 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 661 bytes --]

On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:35:59 -0700 (PDT), Eric Bohn wrote:

> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"
> 
> into your /etc/make.conf file.  All subsequent emerges will then make
> use of the test package versions for the specified arch.  However, this
> is not recommended as it tends to produce an unstable system.

Unstable as in continually changing, not unstable as in prone to crashing.

Provided you are prepared to make the extra effort, such an unstable
system can be worthwhile. On the other hand, if you are running a
production system, stability of package versions is generally A Good
Thing.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Electricians DO IT until it Hz...

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?
  2006-10-19 10:09       ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
@ 2006-10-19 18:23         ` Darren Kirby
  2006-10-19 20:49           ` Daniel Barkalow
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Darren Kirby @ 2006-10-19 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Quoth the Bo Ørsted Andresen
> On Wednesday 18 October 2006 23:35, Darren Kirby wrote:
> > Again, ensure that you have the line:
> >
> > media-sound/dir2ogg ~x86
> >
> > in "/etc/portage/package.keywords"
> >
> > Note that this assumes you are running "x86" ARCH. If you are using a
> > different arch then do the same thing but change the arch to what you are
> > using: ie: "~sparc", "~ppc", or "~amd64".
>
> Actually it doesn't assume anything. It simply means that you accept any
> package that includes the ~x86 keyword..

Sheesh. Sorry for the passive tense.

In what I wrote above: "media-sound/dir2ogg ~x86", as it pertains to the task 
Max needs to do to get a newer version, I am assuming Max is running an x86 
ARCH...

If you really want to be pedantic it doesn't mean "that you accept any package 
that includes the ~x86 keyword", it means you accept the ~x86 keyworded 
version of dir2ogg...

-d
-- 
darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org
"...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..."
- Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?
  2006-10-19 14:38   ` Devon Miller
@ 2006-10-19 19:37     ` Darren Kirby
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Darren Kirby @ 2006-10-19 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Quoth the Devon Miller
> You both seem to be arguing about what constitutes stable. And there are 2
> different definitions: stable as defined by the upstream source and stable
> as defined in portage.

Wrong. I am perfectly aware of what "stable" and "unstable" means to portage. 
I _was_ arguing a point based on Alexander's question which I felt was 
ambiguous. Apparently I am the only one who thought it was ambiguous, ha ha, 
stupid me.

The entire rest of that sub-thread was me and Alexander arguing faulty 
premises based on this initial misunderstanding, and it would best be  
ignored by everyone. 

<snip>

> Now, Darren has added a bug for 0.9.3 and a month later, it's still waiting
> to get added to portage.
> His issue is 0.9.1 and 0.9.2 should have been stable by now.

That is an issue, but not one I am losing sleep over, and not one that I am 
arguing in this thread...

If everyone folowing this thread from the sidelines could just read my first 
response to the OP: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/172487

You can see here I explained to the OP that the newer version was not stable, 
but he could access it using "~x86" keyword. I went on to explain that if he 
wanted the latest upstream version he could use an overlay.

Mark my words: I _do not_ think the upstream stable version should, 
automatically or otherwise, be portage's stable version. I never said any 
such thing in any mail to this thread.

<snip>

> I would suggest Darren look through the develoiper list (
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/roll-call/userinfo.xml) for developers
> handling media-sound. Add them to the cc list on the 0.9.2 ebuild and add a
> comment asking that it be marked stable. And ask for the 0.9.3 to be added
> as ~x86

I will try this. Thank you.

> dcm

-d
-- 
darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org
"...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..."
- Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?
  2006-10-19 18:23         ` Darren Kirby
@ 2006-10-19 20:49           ` Daniel Barkalow
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Barkalow @ 2006-10-19 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 979 bytes --]

On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Darren Kirby wrote:

> Quoth the Bo Ørsted Andresen
> > On Wednesday 18 October 2006 23:35, Darren Kirby wrote:
> >
> > Actually it doesn't assume anything. It simply means that you accept any
> > package that includes the ~x86 keyword..
> 
> Sheesh. Sorry for the passive tense.
> 
> In what I wrote above: "media-sound/dir2ogg ~x86", as it pertains to the task 
> Max needs to do to get a newer version, I am assuming Max is running an x86 
> ARCH...

I think he was trying to point out that ~x86 will give you a newer version 
of dir2ogg even if you're running PPC or something else. It's not a good 
idea, because it could give you a known-broken-on-PPC version that's in 
testing for x86 (if there were such a version) or not give you a testing 
version for PPC known to be broken on x86, but portage doesn't 
fundamentally care whether your keywords actually make any sense together.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-10-19 20:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-10-19 14:35 [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync? Eric Bohn
2006-10-19 14:57 ` Neil Bothwick
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-18  3:37 maxim wexler
2006-10-18  3:43 ` maxim wexler
2006-10-18  3:44 ` Brett I. Holcomb
2006-10-18  3:46 ` Brett I. Holcomb
2006-10-18  3:56 ` Drew
2006-10-18  4:00 ` Darren Kirby
2006-10-18 21:02   ` maxim wexler
2006-10-18 21:35     ` Darren Kirby
2006-10-19  0:06       ` maxim wexler
2006-10-19 10:09       ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2006-10-19 18:23         ` Darren Kirby
2006-10-19 20:49           ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-10-18 21:49     ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-10-18 21:50     ` Neil Bothwick
2006-10-19  0:21     ` b.n.
2006-10-18  8:01 ` Neil Bothwick
2006-10-19 10:04 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: " Alexander Skwar
2006-10-19 14:38   ` Devon Miller
2006-10-19 19:37     ` [gentoo-user] " Darren Kirby

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox