public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Kirby <bulliver@badcomputer.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync?
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:37:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200610191237.09003.bulliver@badcomputer.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c52221f0610190738n2fedcf7bl6db11aba61c8cd3b@mail.gmail.com>

Quoth the Devon Miller
> You both seem to be arguing about what constitutes stable. And there are 2
> different definitions: stable as defined by the upstream source and stable
> as defined in portage.

Wrong. I am perfectly aware of what "stable" and "unstable" means to portage. 
I _was_ arguing a point based on Alexander's question which I felt was 
ambiguous. Apparently I am the only one who thought it was ambiguous, ha ha, 
stupid me.

The entire rest of that sub-thread was me and Alexander arguing faulty 
premises based on this initial misunderstanding, and it would best be  
ignored by everyone. 

<snip>

> Now, Darren has added a bug for 0.9.3 and a month later, it's still waiting
> to get added to portage.
> His issue is 0.9.1 and 0.9.2 should have been stable by now.

That is an issue, but not one I am losing sleep over, and not one that I am 
arguing in this thread...

If everyone folowing this thread from the sidelines could just read my first 
response to the OP: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/172487

You can see here I explained to the OP that the newer version was not stable, 
but he could access it using "~x86" keyword. I went on to explain that if he 
wanted the latest upstream version he could use an overlay.

Mark my words: I _do not_ think the upstream stable version should, 
automatically or otherwise, be portage's stable version. I never said any 
such thing in any mail to this thread.

<snip>

> I would suggest Darren look through the develoiper list (
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/roll-call/userinfo.xml) for developers
> handling media-sound. Add them to the cc list on the 0.9.2 ebuild and add a
> comment asking that it be marked stable. And ask for the 0.9.3 to be added
> as ~x86

I will try this. Thank you.

> dcm

-d
-- 
darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org
"...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..."
- Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-10-19 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-18  3:37 [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync? maxim wexler
2006-10-18  3:43 ` maxim wexler
2006-10-18  5:30   ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
2006-10-18  5:53     ` Darren Kirby
2006-10-18  6:11       ` Iain Buchanan
2006-10-18  6:31       ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
2006-10-18 18:30         ` Darren Kirby
2006-10-18 18:57           ` Willie Wong
2006-10-18 19:20             ` Darren Kirby
2006-10-18 21:37               ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
2006-10-18 21:31             ` Alexander Skwar
     [not found]               ` <200610181449.12060.bulliver@badcomputer.org>
2006-10-19 10:04                 ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
2006-10-19 14:38                   ` Devon Miller
2006-10-19 14:53                     ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
2006-10-19 17:21                     ` [gentoo-user] Re: Re: " Willie Wong
2006-10-19 19:37                     ` Darren Kirby [this message]
     [not found]                   ` <200610191217.17509.bulliver@badcomputer.org>
2006-10-19 21:16                     ` [gentoo-user] [OT] " Justin Findlay
2006-10-18 21:27           ` [gentoo-user] Re: Re: " Alexander Skwar
2006-10-18  7:56       ` [gentoo-user] " Neil Bothwick
2006-10-18 18:23         ` Darren Kirby
2006-10-18 21:38           ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
2006-10-18  3:44 ` [gentoo-user] " Brett I. Holcomb
2006-10-18  3:46 ` Brett I. Holcomb
2006-10-18  3:56 ` Drew
2006-10-18  4:00 ` Darren Kirby
2006-10-18 21:02   ` maxim wexler
2006-10-18 21:35     ` Darren Kirby
2006-10-19  0:06       ` maxim wexler
2006-10-19 10:09       ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2006-10-19 18:23         ` Darren Kirby
2006-10-19 20:49           ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-10-18 21:49     ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-10-18 21:50     ` Neil Bothwick
2006-10-19  0:21     ` b.n.
2006-10-18  5:29 ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
2006-10-18  8:01 ` [gentoo-user] " Neil Bothwick
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-19 14:35 Eric Bohn
2006-10-19 14:57 ` Neil Bothwick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200610191237.09003.bulliver@badcomputer.org \
    --to=bulliver@badcomputer.org \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox