From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GZouB-0004Mx-Sv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:22:52 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k9HDKe4d002410; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:20:40 GMT Received: from shuttle.zlin.dk (port78.ds1-abs.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.227.17]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9HDG2Y7015709 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:16:02 GMT Received: from BA.zlin.dk (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by shuttle.zlin.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03E330037 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:16:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Bo =?utf-8?q?=C3=98rsted_Andresen?= To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is it possible to protect *INDIVIDUAL FILES* against etc-update? Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:16:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200610121910.19727.alan@linuxholdings.co.za> <20061015044052.GB9122@waltdnes.org> <20061015132757.283f8283@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20061015132757.283f8283@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3329038.qORUhymuWW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200610171516.02085.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> X-Archives-Salt: 985a2846-de30-4c74-beb8-6f3482e5b4d9 X-Archives-Hash: e472eb409f9e31f68a9906368c936c17 --nextPart3329038.qORUhymuWW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 15 October 2006 14:27, Neil Bothwick wrote: > As I've mentioned several times before, there was a patch to > dispatch-conf to do just this. You added the files you didn't want > touching, ever, to a line in the config file. Unfortunately, the patch > hasn't been updated for a couple of years and stopped working a while > ago. Why not re-open the bug at > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D68618 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D151685 =2D-=20 Bo Andresen --nextPart3329038.qORUhymuWW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFNNeS8/kKEzmwNNoRAh45AJ929ILA9nGNYpaYanZM367lQ7QzmwCfdSKd ePK4HZOJQNE2h6NPbHQTAGg= =xKeR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3329038.qORUhymuWW-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list