From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GXtad-0007pM-Ue for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 05:58:44 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k9C5ua4r007744; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 05:56:36 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9C5sUxT013829 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 05:54:30 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C164964A22 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 05:54:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.33 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.33 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.111, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL=1.946, TW_XS=0.077] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jLvL3Xn6pnRU for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 05:54:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from badcomputer.org (unknown [24.67.0.189]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB2F64928 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 05:54:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.102] (helo=virgo.badcomputer.org) by badcomputer.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GXtWf-0002By-Vz for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:54:37 -0700 From: darren kirby Organization: Badcomputer Org. To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency... Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:55:53 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <452D469D.1090700@student.chalmers.se> <200610112040.47846.bulliver@badcomputer.org> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610112255.53295.bulliver@badcomputer.org> X-Archives-Salt: 6f005972-3ead-4b01-9972-c90730283e87 X-Archives-Hash: 2c9d04c99798cd5202529b84d0c244ff quoth the Daniel Barkalow: > > > > What's up with this? I really don't want netkit-rsh installed > > either...xsm changelog says nothing... > > You want to be looking at xinit's info; turns out you want the "minimal" > USE flag if you don't want to include the things used by the default > Xsession, which includes xsm (which has, as far as I can tell, always used > netkit-rsh). > > -Daniel > *This .sig left intentionally blank* Thanks, and sorry for the hysteria. I have rebuilt xinit with minimal and netkit-rsh is no longer a deep dependency. I am very unsure what is strictly required with the modular Xorg. -d -- darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org "...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..." - Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list