[gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...

[gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...

[pk]

Hi!

After a "emerge --sync" a while ago a couple of new packages has
appeared on the "emerge radar", namely:

x11-apps/xsm-1.0.1 & net-misc/netkit-rsh

Does anyone know why they have appeared? I don't have them installed
previously and I am quite skeptical about "netkit-rsh" since it installs
rexec, rlogin and rsh.

TIA

Best regards

Peter K
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: xsm and dependency...

[Remy Blank]

pk wrote:
> Does anyone know why they have appeared? I don't have them installed
> previously and I am quite skeptical about "netkit-rsh" since it installs
> rexec, rlogin and rsh.

Me too, since it installs them setuid root.

-- Remy


Remove underscore and suffix in reply address for a timely response.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 429 bytes --]

On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:31:41 +0200, pk wrote:

> Does anyone know why they have appeared? I don't have them installed
> previously and I am quite skeptical about "netkit-rsh" since it installs
> rexec, rlogin and rsh.

emerge --update --deep --tree world will tell you why.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

If a man is standing in the middle of the forest speaking and there is
no woman around to hear him - Is he still wrong?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...

[Iain Buchanan]

On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 21:28 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:31:41 +0200, pk wrote:
> 
> > Does anyone know why they have appeared? I don't have them installed
> > previously and I am quite skeptical about "netkit-rsh" since it installs
> > rexec, rlogin and rsh.
> 
> emerge --update --deep --tree world will tell you why.

hmm, they come from xorg-server-1.1.1-r1:

[nomerge      ]  x11-base/xorg-server-1.1.1-r1
[nomerge      ]   x11-apps/xinit-1.0.2-r6
[ebuild  N    ]    x11-apps/xsm-1.0.1  USE="-debug -xprint"
[ebuild  N    ]     net-misc/netkit-rsh-0.17-r7  USE="pam"

but why? xorg-server doesn't list xsm anywhere in it's ebuild:

$ grep -i
xsm /usr/portage/x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.1.1-r1.ebuild
iain@orpheus ~ $

and netkit-rsh is a hardwired (eg. not dependant on use flag) dependency
of xsm...

so why is xsm being pulled in when xorg-server hasn't been updated??

thanks,
-- 
Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au>

Gravity brings me down.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...

[Daniel Barkalow]

On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Neil Bothwick wrote:

> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:31:41 +0200, pk wrote:
> 
> > Does anyone know why they have appeared? I don't have them installed
> > previously and I am quite skeptical about "netkit-rsh" since it installs
> > rexec, rlogin and rsh.
> 
> emerge --update --deep --tree world will tell you why.

It'll tell you what wants them, but not why. In particular, it 
doesn't specify why xinit-1.0.2-r6, which didn't need xsm on September 
22nd, now does.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...

[darren kirby]

quoth the Daniel Barkalow:
> > emerge --update --deep --tree world will tell you why.
>
> It'll tell you what wants them, but not why. In particular, it
> doesn't specify why xinit-1.0.2-r6, which didn't need xsm on September
> 22nd, now does.

What's up with this? I really don't want netkit-rsh installed either...xsm 
changelog says nothing...

-d
-- 
darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org
"...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..."
- Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...

[Daniel Barkalow]

On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, darren kirby wrote:

> quoth the Daniel Barkalow:
> > > emerge --update --deep --tree world will tell you why.
> >
> > It'll tell you what wants them, but not why. In particular, it
> > doesn't specify why xinit-1.0.2-r6, which didn't need xsm on September
> > 22nd, now does.
> 
> What's up with this? I really don't want netkit-rsh installed either...xsm 
> changelog says nothing...

You want to be looking at xinit's info; turns out you want the "minimal" 
USE flag if you don't want to include the things used by the default 
Xsession, which includes xsm (which has, as far as I can tell, always used 
netkit-rsh).

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...

[darren kirby]

quoth the Daniel Barkalow:
> >
> > What's up with this? I really don't want netkit-rsh installed
> > either...xsm changelog says nothing...
>
> You want to be looking at xinit's info; turns out you want the "minimal"
> USE flag if you don't want to include the things used by the default
> Xsession, which includes xsm (which has, as far as I can tell, always used
> netkit-rsh).
>
> 	-Daniel
> *This .sig left intentionally blank*

Thanks, and sorry for the hysteria. I have rebuilt xinit with minimal and 
netkit-rsh is no longer a deep dependency.  I am very unsure what is strictly 
required with the modular Xorg.

-d  
-- 
darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org
"...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..."
- Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...

[Mick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 847 bytes --]

On Thursday 12 October 2006 06:55, darren kirby wrote:
> quoth the Daniel Barkalow:
> > > What's up with this? I really don't want netkit-rsh installed
> > > either...xsm changelog says nothing...
> >
> > You want to be looking at xinit's info; turns out you want the "minimal"
> > USE flag if you don't want to include the things used by the default
> > Xsession, which includes xsm (which has, as far as I can tell, always
> > used netkit-rsh).
> >
> > 	-Daniel
> > *This .sig left intentionally blank*
>
> Thanks, and sorry for the hysteria. I have rebuilt xinit with minimal and
> netkit-rsh is no longer a deep dependency.  I am very unsure what is
> strictly required with the modular Xorg.

Thank you for raising this - I've also now rebuilt it with the minimal flag 
and removed netkit-rsh and xsm.
-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...

[Bo Ørsted Andresen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 598 bytes --]

On Thursday 12 October 2006 02:49, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> > > Does anyone know why they have appeared? I don't have them installed
> > > previously and I am quite skeptical about "netkit-rsh" since it
> > > installs rexec, rlogin and rsh.
> >
> > emerge --update --deep --tree world will tell you why.
>
> It'll tell you what wants them, but not why. In particular, it
> doesn't specify why xinit-1.0.2-r6, which didn't need xsm on September
> 22nd, now does.

http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/x11-apps/xinit/xinit-1.0.2-r6.ebuild?rev=1.12&view=log

-- 
Bo Andresen

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] xsm and dependency...

[pk]

Neil Bothwick wrote:

> emerge --update --deep --tree world will tell you why.

I thought I did that, but I must have missed the xinit dependency and
it's related minimal USE flag. Guess I was too tired...

Thanks for the input!

Best regards

Peter K
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list