From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GXiv2-0000VP-JD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:35:05 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k9BIWWqg019475; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:32:32 GMT Received: from desiato.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9BIT1YD026290 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:29:02 GMT Received: from hactar.digimed.co.uk (hactar.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.2]) by desiato.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D5073215 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:29:01 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:29:01 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Dumb question Message-ID: <20061011192901.04e33c55@hactar.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <452D3258.6060704@veldy.net> References: <452C714D.2030008@gt.rr.com> <4148457f0610102142hea2c303ub1e29acc43d065fe@mail.gmail.com> <20061011192009.885b9e93.nick@rout.co.nz> <452D3258.6060704@veldy.net> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.3 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_GB72PxexEQMqmMEisY+q64b; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 7efd28a5-2329-4233-bc91-9bce30404362 X-Archives-Hash: bc6e08b9c51cc23b3532c2c3235047dd --Sig_GB72PxexEQMqmMEisY+q64b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:05:12 -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > And ... if the startup scripts change or a major version bump occurs, a=20 > clean shutdown should happen BEFORE the new package is installed. The=20 > portage system really should shutdown any services before an upgrade > occurs. So you're updating SSH over a remote link, portage shuts down sshd then the new version fails to compile, leaving the old version there but not running and no way to fix it from a hundred miles away. No thanks! I can live with portage warning me of what needs to be done, but I'd rather it didn't make unilateral decisions on my behalf. --=20 Neil Bothwick I've got a mind like a... a... what's that thing called? --Sig_GB72PxexEQMqmMEisY+q64b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFLTftum4al0N1GQMRArSCAJ9sgE1r9vKi3JPmhkFdwfQC5SoH8QCgp3/O O24T90+7ciA9+WPuhN7sYoM= =I4n7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_GB72PxexEQMqmMEisY+q64b-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list