* [gentoo-user] Version conflicts when mixing arch and ~arch
@ 2006-10-10 20:37 Alan McKinnon
2006-10-11 9:19 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan McKinnon @ 2006-10-10 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Hi,
A portage question, to satisfy my own curiosity i.e. I know how to fix
the problem I had, but I'd like to know if I fully understand how to
use portage in a case like this:
My desktop is a mostly stable x86 machine, but I use e17-9999 as my wm.
x11-wm/e depends on evas which has a hard dependency on cairo:
cairo? ( >=x11-libs/cairo-1.2 )
I had to unmask e, evas and cairo to get this to emerge.
I also have x86 pygtk and pycairo already installed, pycairo has a hard
dependency on cairo-1.0*
=x11-libs/cairo-1.0*
emerge world wants to downgrade cairo to 1.0* to satisfy pycairo, then
the next emerge world wants to upgrade it to 1.2* to satisfy evas = a
version conflict which yo-yos back and forth. The fix is obviously to
keyword pycairo to ~x86 to give consistent dependencies. This is harder
than it could be: pygtk could also have had it's own conflicts, and it
takes several 'emerge -pv world' and reading ebuilds to get the whole
picture. And this is something portage could have figured out itself.
emerge -p world had to parse the entire portage tree anyway, it could
easily check for versioning conflicts while doing it and display a
message to the user, much like blockers do currently. I get it that
portage likely can't suggest resolutions but it would be nice to see in
one display that evas and pygtk requires mutually exclusive versions of
cairo.
Can portage do this? Is it something useful that warrants a feature
request? Or am I missing an option in the man page even though I've
read it >30 times? :-)
alan
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Version conflicts when mixing arch and ~arch
2006-10-10 20:37 [gentoo-user] Version conflicts when mixing arch and ~arch Alan McKinnon
@ 2006-10-11 9:19 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2006-10-11 10:50 ` Alan McKinnon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bo Ørsted Andresen @ 2006-10-11 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 896 bytes --]
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 22:37, Alan McKinnon wrote:
[SNIP]
> emerge -p world had to parse the entire portage tree anyway, it could
> easily check for versioning conflicts while doing it and display a
> message to the user, much like blockers do currently. I get it that
> portage likely can't suggest resolutions but it would be nice to see in
> one display that evas and pygtk requires mutually exclusive versions of
> cairo.
>
> Can portage do this? Is it something useful that warrants a feature
> request? Or am I missing an option in the man page even though I've
> read it >30 times? :-)
After bug #147766 [1] and bug #16365 [2] have been resolved portage should
detect this. That means that the latest stable portage still won't detect it
but latest ~arch portage should...
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/147766
[2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/16365
--
Bo Andresen
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Version conflicts when mixing arch and ~arch
2006-10-11 9:19 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
@ 2006-10-11 10:50 ` Alan McKinnon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan McKinnon @ 2006-10-11 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 11:19, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 October 2006 22:37, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> [SNIP]
>
> > emerge -p world had to parse the entire portage tree anyway, it
> > could easily check for versioning conflicts while doing it and
> > display a message to the user, much like blockers do currently. I
> > get it that portage likely can't suggest resolutions but it would
> > be nice to see in one display that evas and pygtk requires mutually
> > exclusive versions of cairo.
> >
> > Can portage do this? Is it something useful that warrants a feature
> > request? Or am I missing an option in the man page even though I've
> > read it >30 times? :-)
>
> After bug #147766 [1] and bug #16365 [2] have been resolved portage
> should detect this. That means that the latest stable portage still
> won't detect it but latest ~arch portage should...
>
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/147766
> [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/16365
That's good news. My notebook runs ~x86, meaning I can test the latest
portage there and keyword portage on the desktop if everything seems
fine.
Thanks for the info
alan
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-10-11 10:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-10-10 20:37 [gentoo-user] Version conflicts when mixing arch and ~arch Alan McKinnon
2006-10-11 9:19 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2006-10-11 10:50 ` Alan McKinnon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox