From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GPQeM-0002r4-Hj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:27:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8ILQe5Y021978; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:26:40 GMT Received: from Princeton.EDU (postoffice02.Princeton.EDU [128.112.130.38]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8ILMPn5016935 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:22:25 GMT Received: from smtpserver1.Princeton.EDU (smtpserver1.Princeton.EDU [128.112.129.65]) by Princeton.EDU (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8ILMOte000868 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:22:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sep.dynalias.net (fez.Princeton.EDU [128.112.129.190]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtpserver1.Princeton.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k8ILMOMx007550 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:22:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: by sep.dynalias.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 268281DFCB4; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:23:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:23:19 -0400 From: Willie Wong To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --info Message-ID: <20060918212319.GA171@princeton.edu> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <20060918200853.GA21955@princeton.edu> <20060918171809.755bf614@akuma> <20060918203845.GA6031@princeton.edu> <7573e9640609181343he9d166v2e8920702f44a5ff@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7573e9640609181343he9d166v2e8920702f44a5ff@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: 95bd173c-e814-4fda-a0ae-c7b3aef0fc69 X-Archives-Hash: 70866e8211805f0224a640597622723c On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 01:43:31PM -0700, Penguin Lover Richard Fish squawked: > You really should follow the gcc upgrade guide [1], which tells you to: > > source /etc/profile > I did follow the guide and did source /etc/profile. I just forgot to type that step in in composing the e-mail. And I have a .bash_history to back me up ;p I did a bit of experimentation, actually, and found that the behaviour is different on my laptop and on my desktop. On my laptop where this problem originates (default-linux profile and ~x86 keyword): 1) no matter what I do with gcc-config (and sourcing /etc/profile afterwards of course), the emerge --info gives the same compiler. 2) To actually affect the emerge --info I need to use 'eselect compiler set', i.e. now that I issued 'eselect compiler set 6', my emerge --info reads correctly Portage 2.1.2_pre1 (default-linux/x86/2006.0, gcc-4.1.1/vanilla But on my desktop (which is on a hardened profile with x86 keyword) 3) gcc-config would successfully change the output of emerge --info 4) and 'eselect compiler' returns "!!! Error: Can't load module compiler" which is natural, since eselect-compiler is keyworded ~x86. Are those the intended behaviour? Or is something seriously wacked up? W -- Computer games don't affect kids, I mean if Pac Man affected us as kids, we'd be sitting around in darkened rooms munching pills and listening to repetitive music. Sortir en Pantoufles: up 24 days, 14:43 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list