From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GP8yr-0001Kj-O3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 02:35:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8I2Yteq013288; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 02:34:55 GMT Received: from mail.295.ca (mail.295.ca [66.38.192.228]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8I2Ugbm016840 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 02:30:43 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost.295.ca [127.0.0.1]) by mail.295.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8A728A8657 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:30:41 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at 295.ca Received: from mail.295.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.295.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bOvtuSgSF3jG for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:30:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from waltdnes.org (host-208-65-247-107.dyn.295.ca [208.65.247.107]) by mail.295.ca (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A44128A8B66 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:30:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: by waltdnes.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:30:11 -0400 From: "Walter Dnes" Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:30:11 -0400 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Problems after reemerging xorg-x11 Message-ID: <20060918023011.GA5851@waltdnes.org> References: <200609141847.07033.Dan.Johansson@dmj.nu> <200609171340.44926.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> <9acccfe50609170753w72e43310v4bc86b9d6b83ca26@mail.gmail.com> <200609171626.40925.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <9acccfe50609171123h60708bf1u87d064e963a9b0e0@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9acccfe50609171123h60708bf1u87d064e963a9b0e0@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: 0f5db301-178e-4fec-b840-1d7c40325803 X-Archives-Hash: fc0d44c1ec48ec623be13d75617be4db On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:23:27AM -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote > Thanks all. I added "r128" which seemed the closest to what I > actually have, and I'm now back running with everything coming up > on reboot. I may fool with the proprietary driver, but it doesn't > matter too much -- my use does not stress the video performance much. > I just want it to work. A booby-trap here... if it doesn't say "Rage 128", it's *NOT* an R128 chip. I know "Rage Pro" is Mach64, and I believe "Rage XL" is also a Mach64 chip. http://www.ati.com/products/embedded/ragexl/features.html says that the Rage XL has a 64-bit path, which implies Mach64. -- Walter Dnes In linux /sbin/init is Job #1 My musings on technology and security at http://tech_sec.blog.ca -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list