From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GOvAW-0000BS-IY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:50:40 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8HBnxW4013656; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:49:59 GMT Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8HBh0C0009569 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:43:01 GMT Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id p46so3299169nfa for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 04:43:00 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=m4jzKcrlpMr8St7Cz/HGdk4lVTOpQUxAGXSzzPeb4zhTAd0rQrMjj7r5cQG0tzrMpPEiKbguysWI26VsV+7cnqZ5+vhP1gVZq4b+dq/wWWDIsjgP38Jzzr0NBEErz3nuw/+lvYzmZkQkorgwi+YmMaeWYGrfvDlRMqY3PoPVyWw= Received: by 10.78.128.15 with SMTP id a15mr2794173hud; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 04:43:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.5? ( [213.162.120.196]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 3sm8829466hud.2006.09.17.04.42.59; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 04:43:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation? Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:45:56 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <450CCF71.7020007@veldy.net> <1878303.AA6ZmqbnTS@m-id.message-center.info> <20060917092136.17053e2d@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20060917092136.17053e2d@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3282214.5BjDOWYu1Z"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200609171245.58695.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 4aa714cc-4b04-4759-904a-ef37bcfb212b X-Archives-Hash: 1736c50566dd7f2a5ae069ebe60547d8 --nextPart3282214.5BjDOWYu1Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 17 September 2006 09:21, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:50:28 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > > It makes very little sense to ditch the unix norm of setting a > > > systemwide domain name in favor of doing it per interface! > > > > True. And that's probably why you don't *have* to set it per interface. > > Exactly, the current system gives the choice of setting it globally or > per-interface in the same file. Can you please guide me how to set it up globally? I am not sure I can fol= low=20 the otherwise well commented /etc/conf.d/net. My hardware router/modem act= s=20 as the dns server for the LAN and I used to be able to setup a domainname=20 STUDY for my LAN. =2D-=20 Regards,=20 Mick --nextPart3282214.5BjDOWYu1Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFDTV25Fp0QerLYPcRAirDAJwI1fNOvLlYr8xmIjQQ/aMPUEBmPwCfY52T NrUAcQPAL/Ln6jsD40OjFRQ= =lgPh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3282214.5BjDOWYu1Z-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list