From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GNuLu-0000TB-L6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:46:15 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8EGjL8i003657; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:45:21 GMT Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de (fmmailgate02.web.de [217.72.192.227]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8EGdbZp016628 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:39:37 GMT Received: from smtp05.web.de (fmsmtp05.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.4.166]) by fmmailgate02.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB9E1E9DD19 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:39:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [84.135.254.4] (helo=p5487fe04.dip.t-dialin.net) by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.107 #114) id 1GNuFS-0005lB-00 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:39:34 +0200 From: Frank Baumeister To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage broken Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:40:22 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200609141434.08888.haga.chan@web.de> <200609141746.45091.haga.chan@web.de> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609141840.22215.haga.chan@web.de> Sender: haga.chan@web.de X-Sender: haga.chan@web.de X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id k8EGdbZp016628 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id k8EGjL8w003657 X-Archives-Salt: ee9c794f-6177-4b4c-a157-bd12bac2b618 X-Archives-Hash: 3e20b7c078b5878215cd65243fceda35 On Thursday 14 September 2006 18:17, Drew wrote: > Hi Frank, > > Daniel's solution was one suggested in an earlier thread. The other > was to delete your portage tree and reinstall it via web-rsync > followed by a regular sync. The problem has been documented and the > patch is supposed to work it's way into portage soon: > > [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D147010 > > -- > -Drew Hi Drew, thank you for the hint!! That did the trick. Also a big thank you to=20 Bo =C3=98rsted! Kind regards Frank --=20 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list