From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GN8Vp-0007Lk-Fp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:41:17 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8CDdtw1008183; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:39:55 GMT Received: from cranium.sybase.co.za (sqlprd.sybase.co.za [192.96.139.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8CDYcsd021295 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:34:40 GMT Received: from localhost (cranium.sybase.co.za [127.0.0.1]) by cranium.sybase.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1008344E for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:38:31 +0200 (SAST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sybase.co.za Received: from cranium.sybase.co.za ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cranium.sybase.co.za [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o88Ma6jeouaz for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:38:22 +0200 (SAST) Received: from kenster.sybase.co.za (unknown [192.168.2.135]) by cranium.sybase.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054C78344C for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:38:00 +0200 (SAST) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge wireshark fails Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:34:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200609121448.16280.alan@linuxholdings.co.za> <200609121500.32793.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> In-Reply-To: <200609121500.32793.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609121534.07272.alan@linuxholdings.co.za> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id k8CDYcsd021295 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id k8CDdtwF008183 X-Archives-Salt: ea947edd-6f00-4b9a-b941-6757344fdbee X-Archives-Hash: 82f33d17a06b7c92f7d1c76fac61a4d6 On Tuesday 12 September 2006 15:00, Bo =D8rsted Andresen wrote: > > Anyone seen this before? Am I being stupid (again) or is it > > a bug? And if so, where might the bug be - perl, wireshark, > > or the portage scripts? > > It's a bug in the wireshark ebuild. It hasn't been noticed > until now because it was silently ignored until yesterday. > For details look at [1]. This has been reported in [2]. > Please use bugzilla to search before asking these > questions... Except that this behaviour I see is neither of the cases you=20 mention. They relate to the bahaviour when the minimal flag is=20 set. I'm getting the error when the flag is NOT set. There is=20 no reason why this line should return true on my system: if built_with_use dev-lang/perl minimal In case I still had an ancient faulty perl binary hanging=20 around, I also remerged perl and tried to emerge wireshark=20 again. Same error. So this is not the same bug as any of the 4=20 on the wiki. alan --=20 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list