From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GMSWN-0004zz-Px for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:51:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8AGoF1u032659; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:50:15 GMT Received: from shuttle.zlin.dk (port78.ds1-abs.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.227.17]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8AGi67W002420 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:44:07 GMT Received: from BA.zlin.dk (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by shuttle.zlin.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD0930037 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 18:44:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Bo =?utf-8?q?=C3=98rsted_Andresen?= To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mc-4.6.1 not showing graphical characters in terminal Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 18:44:02 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200609101655.25749.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6607895.AJs4DTsRAF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200609101844.06905.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> X-Archives-Salt: ebda8ab9-f258-4e21-b433-1f5b53be9467 X-Archives-Hash: d131d9f026e5269b13308e59f8f1d1da --nextPart6607895.AJs4DTsRAF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 10 September 2006 17:46, Peter wrote: > > This is not connected to your profile or gcc upgrade. It's your glibc > > upgrade. glibc-2.4.x is stricter when it comes to syntax than > > glibc-2.3.x. Please show the output of: > > I did not upgrade glibc. I recompiled it with the gcc-4.1.1 upgrade. Your emerge --info shows that you are using glibc-2.4 on an x86 stable syst= em.=20 glibc-2.4 and gcc-4.1.1 was stabilized at the exact same time (11 days ago)= =20 so until I see proof of the opposite I am going to assume that glibc was=20 upgraded when you recompiled with gcc-4.1.1. If you still think glibc wasn't upgraded at the same time then please emerg= e=20 app-portage/genlop and show the output of: # genlop sys-libs/glibc # genlop sys-devel/gcc > > # grep -v '^$\|^#' /etc/locale.gen > > en_US ISO-8859-15 So you obviously don't want utf8. Otherwise you should add a utf8 locale to= =20 locale.gen and follow the utf8 guide. Syntax is correct btw... As long as y= ou=20 don't want unicode. [SNIP] > > Also utf8 isn't the default in Gentoo (yet). /etc/env.d/03locale should > > have been created manually when you followed [1] given that you wanted > > utf8. > > I don't have an 03locale file. I manually created an 02locale file. That was a typo. I meant 02locale. Not that it really matters though... > > [1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/utf-8.xml > > I have a lot to learn. As I wrote, I took a lot for granted! AFAICT the real issue, however, seems to be the fact that sys-apps/baselayo= ut=20 has this code in the ebuild: src_unpack() { [...] # Setup unicode defaults for silly unicode users if use unicode ; then sed -i -e '/^UNICODE=3D/s:no:yes:' etc/rc.conf fi [...] } If the unicode use flag is enabled (which it is by default in the 2006.1=20 profiles) this enables unicode in /etc/rc.conf without taking the locale in= to=20 account. That seems stupid IMO. =2D-=20 Bo Andresen --nextPart6607895.AJs4DTsRAF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFBEDW8/kKEzmwNNoRAo7fAKCaev+xJmQM8ESvLfPJJ0bDBlR2KgCfd1bF iYNOKUpzgc2ehwTW+O+z9K4= =vY0v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6607895.AJs4DTsRAF-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list