From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GMNgb-0007W2-NL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 11:41:18 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8ABeYBk001091; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 11:40:34 GMT Received: from localhost (p54852F04.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.133.47.4]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8ABaCqh015658 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 11:36:13 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GMNbg-0004FM-8v for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:36:12 +0200 Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:36:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20060910.133612.104659332.Meino.Cramer@gmx.de> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OT: gkrellm ??? Only as daemon ??? From: Meino Christian Cramer In-Reply-To: <20060910125505.76999df6.hilse@web.de> References: <45031375.3050402@vista-express.com> <20060910.062830.74742666.Meino.Cramer@gmx.de> <20060910125505.76999df6.hilse@web.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.1 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 905db382-2f60-4ffd-8b0f-5e97b9e73bff X-Archives-Hash: 56e745da16528e58eac1925b9dbd293b From: Hans-Werner Hilse Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OT: gkrellm ??? Only as daemon ??? Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:55:05 +0200 > Hi, > > On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 06:28:30 +0200 (CEST) > Meino Christian Cramer wrote: > > > But: Why contains gkrellm's default USE-flags "-X", so no gkrellm2 is compiled? > > I had to change package.use accordingly and recompiling makes gkrellm2 > > then. > > There are no ebuild specific default USE flags; it's your system > (/etc/make.conf and /etc/portage/package.use) that hasn't "X" as a > default USE flag (i.e. what you call "-X as default", but that > inversion isn't actually 100% correct). You probably configured it that > way. > > -hwh > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > Hi Hans-Werner ! thanks for your reply! If I set "X" by default in /etc/make.conf...what happens to programs, which simply doesn't know anything about "X" ... for example "basename" (...yes, I know, "basename" is an builtin in most shells...just an example). Will make.conf override /usr/portagte///*.ebuild ? If so, what happens, if the gentoo developpers have set "-X" intentionally in the *ebuild file and I have set "X" (globally!) in make.conf. Currently I am a little anxious to set "X" (or unset it or set/unset any other USE flag in make.conf due to its global character). On the other side I dont like to compile qt three times for example, due of missing USE flags...(initial compilation, openssl was missing, opengl was missing). (*NO* cristism on the gentoo people intended !!! :) Keep hacking! mcc -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list