From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GLoNy-0008Mo-J6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 21:59:43 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k88LwDSN023796; Fri, 8 Sep 2006 21:58:13 GMT Received: from desiato.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k88Lre86028125 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2006 21:53:40 GMT Received: from krikkit.digimed.co.uk (krikkit.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by desiato.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923FD5C252 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2006 22:53:39 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 22:53:38 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc upgrade from 3.x to 4.x, when should I run revdep-rebuild? Message-ID: <20060908225338.26587c1f@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4501DD4D.3010406@vista-express.com> References: <45011B5C.10401@arcor.de> <4501696D.6060806@vista-express.com> <200609082138.47990.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> <4501DD4D.3010406@vista-express.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.0-rc3 (GTK+ 2.8.20; powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_L9KdvvCrT1RJs_lH6OUWb_b; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: efbe6cfa-451e-470e-8386-6267c30d5eaa X-Archives-Hash: c66ae604fcfaee2de307ac3dd2440a91 --Sig_L9KdvvCrT1RJs_lH6OUWb_b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 16:14:53 -0500, Dale wrote: > > broken /usr/lib/libqavm.la (requires /usr/lib/libaviplayavformat.la) > > broken /usr/lib/libqavm.la (requires /usr/lib/libaviplayavcodec.la) > > broken /usr/lib/libqbanking.la (requires /usr/lib/libaqbanking.la) > > broken /usr/lib/libqbanking.la (requires /usr/lib/libgwenhywfar.la) [repeated] >=20 > I unmerged aqbanking. It wouldn't compile and I was not using it > anyway.=20 >=20 > What you think? Bug or me having a setting wrong?? Did you run fix_libtool_files.sh between merging and unmerging aqbanking? This changes .la files, which means that their checksums no longer match the installed versions so portage doesn't remove them. Whether this is a bug in fix_libtool_files.sh or portage is open for discussion. --=20 Neil Bothwick When companies ship Styrofoam, what do they pack it in? --Sig_L9KdvvCrT1RJs_lH6OUWb_b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFAeZium4al0N1GQMRAslPAKCs4GvTVtxxAdbZZcxuLAczNoMJ1ACdGFXc BgBL7Fz+65+6Ec9YvNji0Wc= =Fy6D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_L9KdvvCrT1RJs_lH6OUWb_b-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list