From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GIryx-0006B2-H4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:13:43 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7VJ7ueJ009922; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:07:56 GMT Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.21]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7VJ3d68018387 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:03:39 GMT Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id EBCDD2003AE for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 20:51:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D4C2003AD for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 20:51:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.2) with ESMTP id 16248263 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 20:51:02 +0200 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: what about glibc upgrade (was: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc 4.1 with gentoo 2006.1) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 20:51:02 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <44F60C0C.3050402@xunil.at> <44F720F4.3010906@veldy.net> <1157049100.13259.11.camel@halde.meinedomain.de> In-Reply-To: <1157049100.13259.11.camel@halde.meinedomain.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608312051.02162.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: a4716d0a-2ff5-4413-8c89-eda5c7a21965 X-Archives-Hash: ac4c6f936242b69eb47518f2dfacf626 On Thursday 31 August 2006 20:31, tdrueke wrote: > Sorry for capturing the thread. :) > > What about the glibc upgrade from 2.3 to 2.4. > Does the same concerning "emerge -e world" apply here > (e.g. it is recommended to do it) ? > > Or is it a more relaxed situation and simply emerging glibc 2.4 is > enough ? > simply emerging glibc 2.4 should be enough. I can't remember that I ever did an -e world after a glibc update. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list