From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GHlUc-0006Vm-8L for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:05:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7SI3dux017300; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:03:39 GMT Received: from desiato.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7SI1JfO009468 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:01:19 GMT Received: from hactar.digimed.co.uk (hactar.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.2]) by desiato.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794BC465 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:01:18 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:01:13 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: fstab devmode Message-ID: <20060828190113.2a3a9119@hactar.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1156783809.26298.23.camel@sysconcept.ca> References: <1156704912.6541.9.camel@sysconcept.ca> <1156723679.14288.3.camel@sysconcept.ca> <20060828093007.1de4ce95@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> <200608281038.22732.ext-dirk.heinrichs@nokia.com> <20060828095151.12ba5ff7@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> <1156783809.26298.23.camel@sysconcept.ca> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.0-rc1 (GTK+ 2.10.2; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_o4Kk+EfcOb_noQlDzSrH0lc; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 9ac000a7-70f8-4ab5-ad71-e44816c040c1 X-Archives-Hash: 9985ff00abb59ace6b7eb2e1c486a976 --Sig_o4Kk+EfcOb_noQlDzSrH0lc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:50:09 -0600, Joseph wrote: > > > lvmfs? Never heard of this ;-) =20 > >=20 > > That's why I asked if it counted ;-) =20 >=20 > What is the result (disk space) in comparison to vfat, ext2 etc.? As Dirk pointed out, LVM is not a filesystem. If you want maximum portability, FAT is the best choice. If you want to cram as much as possible on the device, either use ReiserFS or get a larger device. --=20 Neil Bothwick Why is the alphabet in that order? Is it because of that song? --Sig_o4Kk+EfcOb_noQlDzSrH0lc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE8y9tum4al0N1GQMRAuE2AKCnGpalLQNmowc1FLB8LaAXW66MiwCgovkO ldbQysb0/wWz+tExr6dT8Xs= =Cpob -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_o4Kk+EfcOb_noQlDzSrH0lc-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list