From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GCXPo-0004Ml-Dn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:03:16 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7E7xst2007399; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 07:59:54 GMT Received: from desiato.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7E7vqcY032563 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 07:57:52 GMT Received: from hactar.digimed.co.uk (hactar.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.2]) by desiato.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E07985D8 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:57:51 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:57:47 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Message from emerge re transfig is ineffective Message-ID: <20060814085747.165a462d@hactar.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <9acccfe50608131935w731587c0m9c0971406aa19161@mail.gmail.com> References: <9acccfe50608090837i516142c6r8b789b7328ade1a9@mail.gmail.com> <20060809172519.7772ffab@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <9acccfe50608131935w731587c0m9c0971406aa19161@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.4.0 (GTK+ 2.10.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_ET.76DFn8JBEazDosUY+YUS; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: a4150314-cbfb-48d0-96da-431562cb67ca X-Archives-Hash: 8fabb38b66337572d43f49807cd2e58f --Sig_ET.76DFn8JBEazDosUY+YUS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 19:35:59 -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: > > It's a QA message from portage to the developer of the ebuild, ignore > > it. > Isn't there some way "they" could flag such messages so it doesn't > look like a peremptory command I have to jump up and perform? Removing strict from FEATURES should stop you seeing these AFAIR. --=20 Neil Bothwick He who laughs last probably made a back-up. --Sig_ET.76DFn8JBEazDosUY+YUS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE4Cz/um4al0N1GQMRAhJ8AKCz9iiOo2QyHXvmrYDDF8tcqKXG4QCfb7Z4 CBH3F1zXZrNCmVAJbNUFzys= =xKdk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_ET.76DFn8JBEazDosUY+YUS-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list