From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GBndc-0006Tr-Sf for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 12 Aug 2006 07:10:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7C77q1D011342; Sat, 12 Aug 2006 07:07:52 GMT Received: from web31805.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31805.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.68]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7C75NeC007850 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2006 07:05:23 GMT Received: (qmail 53857 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Aug 2006 07:05:22 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=oM++GBqPZSh3hsOXU+A3b9cu0Z9XJxDzzsyAhhdg34f6PB3iyUGpeEi2No1UA4Sy9gZQg8tOQncEFVfzt+aDAsWE1i6RHcHea3pi9WbCwYThZq9so/OS787XCbVw0GRN4QKw9Mn/I6746W+1fHShW54RjOvTerZ/hyP+L5ip8uA= ; Message-ID: <20060812070522.53855.qmail@web31805.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.54.196.198] by web31805.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:05:22 PDT Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:05:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Richard Broersma Jr Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 missing g++/c++ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <7573e9640608112338j7d85585k32af673867df047b@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 8316ab73-b5e9-4be7-b369-e9a28fd9a636 X-Archives-Hash: 47956cc87c7582116431caed906f92b3 > Unless you are crazy enough to have USE=nocxx, you get a c++ compiler > with gcc. Others are controlled by USE flags. I don't believe that I included the USE=nocxx variable. I will give another try at re-building GCC a little later just to see if I get the same effect. (Honestly, I did add a few additional Use Flags before I emerge gcc. gdj and fortran were some of them. I went through and pruned a few of them when I first started having problems with some of packages failing to emerge.) > > gcj - java compiler > fortran - fortran compiler > ...and so on. > > > ncurces, groff, sys-libs/db, python > > > > All fail with the same error > > What error? These various errors sound very similar. Here is an error I've transposed from the last package in the emerge --resume --skipfirst. ../../build-aux/depcomp:line 512: execg++ not found make[4]: *** [calc++-scanner.o] Error 127 Other packages will give up during the sanity check when they discovered there wasn't a g++ compiler for available. Thanks for the reply. Regards, Richard Broersma Jr. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list