From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G519I-0001Hv-L8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:11:09 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k6OE7sVc013562; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:07:54 GMT Received: from rutherford.zen.co.uk (rutherford.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.142]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6OE4vSj014129 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:04:58 GMT Received: from [82.69.83.178] (helo=desiato.digimed.co.uk) by rutherford.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1G513I-0007wE-L4 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:04:56 +0000 Received: from hactar.digimed.co.uk (hactar.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.2]) by desiato.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D111514002A3 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:05:45 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:05:42 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] PORTAGE_ELOG error Message-ID: <20060724150542.76fbfc45@hactar.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <44C3C7CC.8080506@mid.email-server.info> References: <49bf44f10607220921r614c9650v33f73c25ebb59d3c@mail.gmail.com> <44C25502.5020804@mid.email-server.info> <49bf44f10607221007r522789q6921abeb7ca3f7d0@mail.gmail.com> <44C26BCA.1020008@mid.email-server.info> <20060722214255.065606d3@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> <44C2A03E.4090001@mid.email-server.info> <20060723120542.228d2b9e@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <44C36B2A.7090100@mid.email-server.info> <20060723163307.0abf49d9@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> <44C3C7CC.8080506@mid.email-server.info> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.4.0-rc4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_ik92VFAkVuyJewGXTXazNg5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Originating-Rutherford-IP: [82.69.83.178] X-Archives-Salt: aac316b6-f1f4-4621-949d-eea6fae96e54 X-Archives-Hash: 1889cb2f6aea72ee9b3950fafd51adfb --Sig_ik92VFAkVuyJewGXTXazNg5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:02:36 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > It's not wasteful, as it provides an easy option for many people and > > it uses existing software. >=20 > It IS wasteful, as it doesn't use existing, standard software and > as it re-implements a functionality, which is very likely to be > present already. Except that Python's smtplib is existing, standard software. The rest of the discussion is moot as neither of us had read make.,conf.example carefully enough until now :( --=20 Neil Bothwick This signature project was my last, best hope to seem eloquent. It failed. But in the year of Decency In Communications Act, it became something greater. My last, best hope for satire. The year is 1997. The Place: Babbling On Pine. --Sig_ik92VFAkVuyJewGXTXazNg5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFExNO5um4al0N1GQMRAvjqAJ9bjnOTK7y4thklxZyFpArYT3LxaACdGmUy WSI/xRKcMdFciYDosGKaNKs= =IOyS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_ik92VFAkVuyJewGXTXazNg5-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list