From: Hans-Werner Hilse <hilse@web.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-x11, $VIDEO_CARDS & binary packages
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 22:10:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060720221033.39440aba.hilse@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <342e1090607201140k2431da80ie1bf18de28ff45e3@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:40:39 -0300
"Daniel da Veiga" <danieldaveiga@gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe I'm wrong, but binary packages are BINARY (-k), so, you can't
> change their USE, because they're already compiled, they'll use the
> flags that were used by the time the package was created. If you
> install it creating binaries (FEATURES="buildpkg" emerge xorg-x1) now
> with another USE or emerge it and create the binaries after it
> (quickpkg), then you may get what you want when you try and reinstall
> it.
>
> Someone will correct me if I'm wrong, I'm using logic here, not
> exactly empiric knowledge ;)
But it's right :-). Even if xorg-x11 may be a "meta" package, it's a
package, after all. And thus it's set of USE flags (and those
additional configuration vars that are listed in verbose output of
emerge) was *fixed* when the binary was created. That makes perfectly
sense -- if you want it to get rebuild, don't use -k. And it's a meta
package, it does download nothing at all. So having a binary of it
doesn't make much sense if there's a very heterogenous number of
clients that make use of the binaries. For restoring the machine that
built the binaries, however, it makes perfectly sense (as long as
hardware doesn't change).
-hwh
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-20 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-19 4:51 [gentoo-user] xorg-x11, $VIDEO_CARDS & binary packages Alexander Puchmayr
2006-07-19 6:44 ` Richard Fish
2006-07-19 18:20 ` Richard Fish
2006-07-20 4:29 ` Alexander Puchmayr
2006-07-20 4:56 ` Ryan Tandy
2006-07-20 5:44 ` Alexander Puchmayr
2006-07-20 7:40 ` Richard Fish
[not found] ` <200607202019.25875.alexander.puchmayr@linznet.at>
2006-07-20 18:37 ` Richard Fish
2006-07-20 19:25 ` Richard Fish
2006-07-20 15:54 ` Ryan Tandy
2006-07-20 18:25 ` Alexander Puchmayr
2006-07-20 18:40 ` Daniel da Veiga
2006-07-20 20:10 ` Hans-Werner Hilse [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060720221033.39440aba.hilse@web.de \
--to=hilse@web.de \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox