public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans-Werner Hilse <hilse@web.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-x11, $VIDEO_CARDS & binary packages
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 22:10:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060720221033.39440aba.hilse@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <342e1090607201140k2431da80ie1bf18de28ff45e3@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:40:39 -0300
"Daniel da Veiga" <danieldaveiga@gmail.com> wrote:

> Maybe I'm wrong, but binary packages are BINARY (-k), so, you can't
> change their USE, because they're already compiled, they'll use the
> flags that were used by the time the package was created. If you
> install it creating binaries (FEATURES="buildpkg" emerge xorg-x1) now
> with another USE or emerge it and create the binaries after it
> (quickpkg), then you may get what you want when you try and reinstall
> it.
> 
> Someone will correct me if I'm wrong, I'm using logic here, not
> exactly empiric knowledge ;)

But it's right :-). Even if xorg-x11 may be a "meta" package, it's a
package, after all. And thus it's set of USE flags (and those
additional configuration vars that are listed in verbose output of
emerge) was *fixed* when the binary was created. That makes perfectly
sense -- if you want it to get rebuild, don't use -k. And it's a meta
package, it does download nothing at all. So having a binary of it
doesn't make much sense if there's a very heterogenous number of
clients that make use of the binaries. For restoring the machine that
built the binaries, however, it makes perfectly sense (as long as
hardware doesn't change).

-hwh
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



      reply	other threads:[~2006-07-20 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-19  4:51 [gentoo-user] xorg-x11, $VIDEO_CARDS & binary packages Alexander Puchmayr
2006-07-19  6:44 ` Richard Fish
2006-07-19 18:20 ` Richard Fish
2006-07-20  4:29   ` Alexander Puchmayr
2006-07-20  4:56     ` Ryan Tandy
2006-07-20  5:44       ` Alexander Puchmayr
2006-07-20  7:40         ` Richard Fish
     [not found]           ` <200607202019.25875.alexander.puchmayr@linznet.at>
2006-07-20 18:37             ` Richard Fish
2006-07-20 19:25               ` Richard Fish
2006-07-20 15:54         ` Ryan Tandy
2006-07-20 18:25           ` Alexander Puchmayr
2006-07-20 18:40             ` Daniel da Veiga
2006-07-20 20:10               ` Hans-Werner Hilse [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060720221033.39440aba.hilse@web.de \
    --to=hilse@web.de \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox