public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philip Webb <purslow@sympatico.ca>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading to gcc 4.1 , question on recompiling
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:06:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060720000613.GA4807@sympatico.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060719152204.1fe10835@hactar.digimed.co.uk>

060719 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> 060719 Philip Webb wrote:
>> I upgraded to 4.1.1 a couple of weeks ago & haven't done a mass recompile
>> & I have yet to run into any problem
> I recompiled glibc, to be on the safe side
> and KDE because it did have problems, but nothing else caused a problem.

Yes, that's my situation: I also upgraded to Glibc 2.4 & KDE 3.5.3 ;
IIRC the only additional problem was a tiny glitch with Krusader,
which wasn't really related to GCC 4.1.1 .

> Running testing, most packages wb recompiled within a month anyway.

I have a lot of "testing" packages, which run without problems.
A lot of outstanding bugs seem to affect only a few special users.
Yet again, Gentoo should make a 4th category by making "stable" = "server"
& splitting "testing" into "newly unmasked" & "desktop-ready":
many "testing" packages today are in fact desktop-ready,
ie the remaining bugs will be rare & easy to recover from.

> I wanted to see if the 'kdehiddenvisibility' flag made any difference

What was your experience ?  Do you recommend others (me) to use it ?

-- 
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT     ___________//___,  Philip Webb : purslow@chass.utoronto.ca
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|  Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT    `-O----------O---'  University of Toronto
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-20  0:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20060719105701.59255.qmail@web61014.mail.yahoo.com>
2006-07-19 12:30 ` [gentoo-user] Upgrading to gcc 4.1 , question on recompiling Alexander Skwar
2006-07-19 13:05   ` Philip Webb
2006-07-19 13:20     ` [gentoo-user] " Sven Köhler
2006-07-19 13:34     ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
2006-07-19 13:51       ` Richard Broersma Jr
2006-07-19 13:57         ` Alexander Skwar
2006-07-19 14:22       ` Neil Bothwick
2006-07-20  0:06         ` Philip Webb [this message]
2006-07-20  8:02           ` Neil Bothwick
2006-07-20 16:47           ` Alexander Skwar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060720000613.GA4807@sympatico.ca \
    --to=purslow@sympatico.ca \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox