public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Rout <nick@rout.co.nz>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-x11 screwup
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 09:37:45 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060704093509.F86E.NICK@rout.co.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87odw7qmps.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk>


On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 06:30:39 +0100
Graham Murray wrote:

> "W.Kenworthy" <billk@iinet.net.au> writes:
> 
> > yes I hit it too - back before it hit stable.  It seemed that going xorg
> > modular is a one way trip as you cant remove modular xorg easily unless
> > you keep an independent record of every package installed.  I was pissed
> > because modular didnt work and I couldnt uninstall it!  Eventually
> > updates caught up with and fixed the problem, but in the meantime I had
> > an unusable system.  I realised the problem when I coulnt even downgrade
> > from 7.1 to 7.0 - this loss of control is a major pita with modular X.
> 
> Maybe what is needed is an enhancement to portage to allow the removal
> of a meta-package to (optionally) also remove the 'real' packages
> which it caused to be installed.

ummmm think about this.

new system, no gui installed.

I install kde-meta, which installs xorg-x11 as a dependency.

I decide I want gnome, I install gnome which doesn't install xorg,
because it is already installed.

I decide I do not want kde because i prefer gnome. I unsinstall
kde-meta. Under your scheme it would also uninstall xorg-x11. But that
is not what you want!


> -- 
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

-- 
Nick Rout <nick@rout.co.nz>

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-07-03 21:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-02 15:24 [gentoo-user] xorg-x11 screwup Matthew R. Lee
2006-07-02 19:19 ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-07-02 20:17   ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2006-07-02 20:24     ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-07-02 20:29       ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2006-07-02 23:05       ` W.Kenworthy
2006-07-03  3:31         ` Nick Rout
2006-07-03  5:30         ` Graham Murray
2006-07-03  7:12           ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-07-03 21:37           ` Nick Rout [this message]
2006-07-04 16:29             ` Re[2]: " Robert Cernansky
2006-07-04 16:54               ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2006-07-04 17:11               ` Re[2]: " Alan McKinnon
2006-07-04 17:44                 ` Re[4]: " Robert Cernansky
2006-07-04 20:45                 ` Neil Bothwick
2006-07-05  3:37                   ` Nick Rout
2006-07-05  7:52                     ` Neil Bothwick
2006-07-02 20:39   ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2006-07-02 20:53     ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-07-02 21:00       ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2006-07-02 21:39         ` Matthew R. Lee
2006-07-02 21:45           ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-07-02 22:01           ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2006-07-03 22:22           ` Matthew R. Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060704093509.F86E.NICK@rout.co.nz \
    --to=nick@rout.co.nz \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox