From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fxg1y-00010U-9U for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 08:13:14 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k648B42M006596; Tue, 4 Jul 2006 08:11:04 GMT Received: from tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts22.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.184]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6484WXv017276 for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2006 08:04:32 GMT Received: from sympatico.ca ([70.49.158.68]) by tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with SMTP id <20060704080431.IAJ10262.tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net@sympatico.ca> for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2006 04:04:31 -0400 Received: by sympatico.ca (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 4 Jul 2006 04:04:31 -0400 Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 04:04:31 -0400 From: Philip Webb To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] kdelibs again: 'moc' & USE flags ? Message-ID: <20060704080431.GA4806@sympatico.ca> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <20060702124702.GA4808@sympatico.ca> <200607021704.35993.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <20060703031230.GA4811@sympatico.ca> <20060703140637.GD4811@sympatico.ca> <7573e9640607030920xd1f0156k6aa69cab21629052@mail.gmail.com> <20060703164028.GA4811@sympatico.ca> <7573e9640607031503o1fb02ccav4c59d43ca3b50662@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7573e9640607031503o1fb02ccav4c59d43ca3b50662@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: c6604e0f-dc3d-4e84-afd9-77df2139a9e7 X-Archives-Hash: 743efb1b701ff53467034125bdf9d554 060703 Richard Fish wrote: > On 7/3/06, Philip Webb wrote: >> FEATURES=" ... confcache ... " > confcache has also been known to cause strange problems > and in fact is currently package.mask'ed. Yes, as I now notice: it was "testing" when I set it up a few days ago. Thanks (and to the other 2 respondents) for pointing this out. >> I still don't know what "moc" means: can you/anyone explain ? > I forget what the acronym means (meta-object compiler?), > but it is how Qt and thus KDE apps convert their user interface files > into .h and .cpp sources. The idea is that moc is run against a .ui file, > which generates corresponding .h and .cpp sources, > which are then compiled with gcc. Thus in a parallel make, > another thread could try to use the .h and .cpp files generated by moc > before moc has finished with them, > leading to missing files or undefined type errors. Thanks for this partial enlightenment: I will file it away. So having dropped Confcache, I'll try the whole exercise again. -- ========================,,============================================ SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : purslow@chass.utoronto.ca ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list