From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FxZgV-0001CM-IV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 01:26:40 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k641OMmk024875; Tue, 4 Jul 2006 01:24:22 GMT Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6416SL8029521 for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2006 01:06:29 GMT Received: from frontend3.internal (frontend3.internal [10.202.2.152]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A939DD8B643 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 21:06:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by frontend3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 03 Jul 2006 21:06:30 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: PHFtYEnQ9/8DvnV9/lJwJ/Xc2MeCbxNUxirBBJEjJtpj 1151975182 Received: from localhost (67-54-254-35.cust.wildblue.net [67.54.254.35]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D359A988 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 21:06:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 21:06:07 -0400 From: "John J. Foster" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] package version notification (~/+)? Message-ID: <20060704010607.GB8426@garbanzo> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <44A95F30.7080805@gmx.net> <20060703200724.646085fc@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1LKvkjL3sHcu1TtY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060703200724.646085fc@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> Organization: Representing the Mambo User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: d46b566f-a94d-45d6-8f2a-ff70ca194f2d X-Archives-Hash: f08fb02ea15ca025e167baf5e72d9abd --1LKvkjL3sHcu1TtY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 08:07:24PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: >=20 > No, but if you put a specific version in /etc/portage/package.keywords, > only that version will be installed from testing. It will only be > upgraded when a newer version goes stable. Neil - I _think_ this is what I have not been able to understand for over a year now. I run an almost entirely stable system, and want to keep it that way. But occassionally there is something I want that is currently ~x86, for instance amarok. So what you're saying is that if I #echo =3Dmedia-sound/amarok-1.4.0a-r1 >> /etc/portage/package.keywords I will not get the next testing version of amarok, but will get the next stable? If this is true, it's only further proof of how dense I can be at times. Thanks, festus --=20 It is not unusual for those at the wrong end of the club to have a clearer picture of reality than those who wield it. Noam Chomsky --1LKvkjL3sHcu1TtY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEqb7/4FEnevDNLQ4RAnpIAJ43wnGDbsTwvCJDjXPMJ3t+9SummwCfS+Q9 7VoK/8WCexg8adpKyaPxjCY= =Bo5s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1LKvkjL3sHcu1TtY-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list