From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FxXLM-0003pv-CR for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 22:56:40 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k63Msw3S019326; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 22:54:58 GMT Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k63MmhVv024085 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 22:48:43 GMT Received: from [84.148.66.142] (helo=cinzia.homelinux.org) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu6) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML29c-1FxXDc2ynd-0003NK; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 00:48:41 +0200 From: Luigi Pinna To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] lost deadkeys layout Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 00:48:28 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200607022010.35601.mailing-gentoo@sailorferris.com> <200607032302.12530.mailing-gentoo@sailorferris.com> <200607040020.55188.benno.schulenberg@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200607040020.55188.benno.schulenberg@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607040048.41952.mailing-gentoo@sailorferris.com> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:e46971f3dd90066ba59bca989fa63868 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: b2e8c9f1-99fc-4f38-8dad-135acabca806 X-Archives-Hash: deb91f57233a480842c9cc55ddf08cd6 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alle 00:20, marted́ 4 luglio 2006, Benno Schulenberg ha scritto: > Luigi Pinna wrote: > > Alle 22:20, luned́ 3 luglio 2006, Benno Schulenberg ha scritto: > > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2004-05/msg00041.html > > > suggests that you may have a mistaken symlink > > > somewhere as a result of downgrading. > > If all else fails, start looking for old symlinks. Look > under /usr/lib/X11/xkb, or use equery to see where the files of > setxkbmap get installed. I had no old symllinks... I searched them... I tried all what it was wrote in your links (without upgrade): nothing works! > > > Option "XkbRules" "xorg" > > Option "XkbModel" "pc105" > > Option "XkbLayout" "de" > > Option "XkbVariant" "nodeadkeys" > > Comment all of these out, then try experimenting again with > setxkmap. > > Benno I did it, no changes in output (same for setxkbmap too!) My question is: how is it possible that the package is marked stable if there is a bug like it? In a your link says that the problem is solved in the 7.1 and no patch for the 7.0? Very strange... I have no idea more... Luigi - -- Public key GPG(0x633F86B7) on hkp://keyserver.linux.it/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEqZ7JHmkkjmM/hrcRAh1HAJ9csgkK9F3dfBSLHaHIssFtLj0TQQCfag43 QAU23jmfZc1L2Q8/mJ1aTyQ= =8TDX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list