From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FxV9I-0000CB-B8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 20:36:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k63KSCT3032582; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 20:28:12 GMT Received: from cicero0.cybercity.dk (cicero0.cybercity.dk [212.242.40.52]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k63K5GBA011908 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 20:05:16 GMT Received: from user2.cybercity.dk (user2.cybercity.dk [212.242.41.35]) by cicero0.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB556795AB for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 22:05:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from BA.zlin.dk (port78.ds1-abs.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.227.17]) by user2.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70C8286BF1 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 22:05:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Bo =?iso-8859-1?q?=D8rsted_Andresen?= To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Stable MythTV removed from portage? Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 22:06:16 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <200607022235.44461.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> <20060703153424.0ACC.NICK@rout.co.nz> <5bdc1c8b0607030605y1ac19a98v6b3a6f29c2e4436b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b0607030605y1ac19a98v6b3a6f29c2e4436b@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart230413580.lTLPvPAQLh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200607032206.20042.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> X-Archives-Salt: 59832371-d22c-4a89-9c24-36e1c115cccb X-Archives-Hash: 61181cf386cc10bf63b8706720e35b81 --nextPart230413580.lTLPvPAQLh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 03 July 2006 15:05, Mark Knecht wrote: > More importantly (to me) is that when looking at a distro like this > what are the issues with =A0leaving an older revision in portage? I > don't see what the maintainance issues are. It's been a working ebuild > for a long time. If you think so then I suggest you go to bugs.gentoo.org and search for myt= htv=20 bugs. As long as it is in portage marked as stable maintaining it means the= y=20 should try to solve those bugs. =2D-=20 Bo Andresen --nextPart230413580.lTLPvPAQLh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEqXi88/kKEzmwNNoRAonVAJ402y4CESr258xqxGaOR2sIKKACHACgm3nw lsXq2MmDnmaGGKZCLdQIeEk= =obbQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart230413580.lTLPvPAQLh-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list