From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FxTl5-0003cl-Na for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 19:07:00 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k63J1075009515; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 19:01:00 GMT Received: from heisenberg.zen.co.uk (heisenberg.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.141]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k63ISX3X025933 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 18:28:33 GMT Received: from [82.69.83.178] (helo=desiato.digimed.co.uk) by heisenberg.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1FxT9t-0002rd-9A for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 18:28:33 +0000 Received: from hactar.digimed.co.uk (hactar.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.2]) by desiato.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6F714002C0 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 19:28:32 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 19:28:28 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] kdelibs : solved ! blame confcache ! Message-ID: <20060703192828.58d2ff0b@hactar.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20060703175107.GB4811@sympatico.ca> References: <20060702124702.GA4808@sympatico.ca> <200607021704.35993.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <20060703031230.GA4811@sympatico.ca> <20060703140637.GD4811@sympatico.ca> <7573e9640607030920xd1f0156k6aa69cab21629052@mail.gmail.com> <20060703164028.GA4811@sympatico.ca> <20060703175107.GB4811@sympatico.ca> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.4.0-rc2 (GTK+ 2.8.19; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_J0VIhg9VWOikWhCGZft6rol; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Originating-Heisenberg-IP: [82.69.83.178] X-Archives-Salt: 25baedff-b18f-4683-89fa-2c79babe45bb X-Archives-Hash: db117561c14f9685acdee1a6a07f5dfd --Sig_J0VIhg9VWOikWhCGZft6rol Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 13:51:07 -0400, Philip Webb wrote: > Is confcache considered stable ? Should I file a bug about this ? confcache is package.masked, you definitely should not file a bug about it. $ grep -B 2 confcache /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask # Diego Petten=C3=B2 (25 Jun 2006) # confcache really needs more work before prime-time # please don't file bugs for this unless you also have a solution dev-util/confcache --=20 Neil Bothwick Top Oxymorons Number 47: Act naturally --Sig_J0VIhg9VWOikWhCGZft6rol Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEqWHQum4al0N1GQMRAifFAJ9TmwenfCTFrZOhj6qh2+0SJPU8VQCgt2HO lLepwaRE48vo+Tj3aWoAUFo= =K4Fy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_J0VIhg9VWOikWhCGZft6rol-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list