From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FwhoO-0007zW-O5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 01 Jul 2006 15:55:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k61FrxLx000174; Sat, 1 Jul 2006 15:53:59 GMT Received: from cicero0.cybercity.dk (cicero0.cybercity.dk [212.242.40.52]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k61FicGF008752 for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2006 15:44:38 GMT Received: from user2.cybercity.dk (user2.cybercity.dk [212.242.41.35]) by cicero0.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490D7678DE4 for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2006 17:44:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from BA.zlin.dk (port78.ds1-abs.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.227.17]) by user2.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182272868A2 for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2006 17:44:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Bo =?utf-8?q?=C3=98rsted_Andresen?= To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] xgl, masked packages, and me going crazy Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 17:45:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <200607010934.27502.agharti81@tiscali.it> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2143698.cAxsFj7XSn"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200607011745.40421.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> X-Archives-Salt: c81d85b4-6f31-4526-b27c-b5e431b7db51 X-Archives-Hash: 399203884a2ecdf0a51b564ef0b2a01d --nextPart2143698.cAxsFj7XSn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 01 July 2006 17:32, Jason Weisberger wrote: > I believe that missing keyword stuff can be unmasked if you put > x11-libs/libdrm - in your package.keywords. This is just a guess, but I > think it should work. This isn't a fix, you should probably file a > bugzilla report on it, as nothing in the package database should be witho= ut > a keyword. The ebuilds that the OP is referring to is not in the tree. They are from t= he=20 portage-xgl overlay. This overlay contains alpha software which is nowhere= =20 near stable. Also the fact that a package is masked by missing keyword simp= ly=20 indicates that the package has not been tested on your architecture.. =2D-=20 Bo Andresen --nextPart2143698.cAxsFj7XSn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEppik8/kKEzmwNNoRAsexAJ9ybseqdstFiKNKqd2jOZ/rQovtbgCfVEXY mU2TPtJIJHq/qTtB1WudV9o= =4Hjm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2143698.cAxsFj7XSn-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list