Re: [gentoo-user] Strange messages at boot

[Etaoin Shrdlu <shrdlu@unlimitedmail.org>]

On Thursday 29 June 2006 13:35, jarry@gmx.net wrote:

> Probably net.eth0 starting has beem somehow moved into boot-runlevel.
> AFAIK it should be in defeult-runlevel, so try to move it there:
>
> rc-update del net.eth0 boot
> rc-update add net.eth0 default

No, it's correctly in default runlevel (spaced for better readability):

[Thu Jun 29 14:59:18 root@mozart ~]# rc-update show
 * Invalid runlevel entry: /etc/runlevels/boot/.keep
 * Invalid runlevel entry: /etc/runlevels/default/.keep
 * Invalid runlevel entry: /etc/runlevels/nonetwork/.keep
 * Invalid runlevel entry: /etc/runlevels/single/.keep
               acpid |      default
            bootmisc | boot
             checkfs | boot
           checkroot | boot
               clock | boot
         consolefont | boot
               cupsd |      default
          domainname |      default
                famd |      default
            hostname | boot
             hotplug | boot
            iptables |      default
             keymaps | boot
               local |      default nonetwork
          localmount | boot
             modules | boot
            net.eth0 |      default
              net.lo | boot
            netmount |      default
           rmnologin | boot
              serial | boot
               spamd |      default
                sshd |      default
            sysklogd |      default
             urandom | boot
          vixie-cron |      default
                 xfs |      default

[Thu Jun 29 14:59:25 root@mozart ~]# ls /etc/runlevels/boot/
bootmisc  checkroot  consolefont  hotplug  localmount  net.lo     serial
checkfs   clock      hostname     keymaps  modules     rmnologin  urandom

[Thu Jun 29 14:59:37 root@mozart ~]# ls -l /etc/runlevels/default
acpid  domainname  iptables  net.eth0  spamd  sysklogd    xfs
cupsd  famd        local     netmount  sshd   vixie-cron



Typing the first command showed also the "Invalid runlevel 
entry: /etc/runlevels/boot/.keep" errors that I did not notice before. 
Seems that the new baselayout has introduced some changes. I'll 
investigate further.

Thanks for the reply.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list