From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fvc3C-0006Di-Q1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:33:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5SFV4MG023867; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:31:04 GMT Received: from pythagoras.zen.co.uk (pythagoras.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.140]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5SFNnn7027000 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:23:49 GMT Received: from [82.69.83.178] (helo=desiato.digimed.co.uk) by pythagoras.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1FvbtN-0004rA-4v for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:23:49 +0000 Received: from hactar.digimed.co.uk (hactar.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.2]) by desiato.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84A81406204 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:23:47 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:23:44 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: kconsole lost PTYs Message-ID: <20060628162344.61cd70b0@hactar.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <20060628083710.487f4ac4@hactar.digimed.co.uk> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.4.0-rc1 (GTK+ 2.8.19; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_Cwq32VbL_i=Ik7j2eOic7an"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Originating-Pythagoras-IP: [82.69.83.178] X-Archives-Salt: 809d8d94-a270-48f7-8d14-b181604451d7 X-Archives-Hash: a47d16ae02a4fcc5356bcb0372c1b89c --Sig_Cwq32VbL_i=Ik7j2eOic7an Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:57:28 +0000 (UTC), James wrote: > # egrep null 50-udev.rules > KERNEL=3D=3D"null", NAME=3D"%k", MODE=3D"0666" >=20 > Why is /dev/null getting repeatedly set to more restrictive > permission than 666? Is another rule overriding this one? Try grep null /etc/udev/rules.d/*.rules --=20 Neil Bothwick Who messed with my anti-paranoia shot? --Sig_Cwq32VbL_i=Ik7j2eOic7an Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEop8Eum4al0N1GQMRAtOyAJ9ozUtr7tF1FTmmiR7nB56oMXojqwCffTDK 3Csb7aSuyzgHDjohs+cutbo= =WNNr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_Cwq32VbL_i=Ik7j2eOic7an-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list