From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ft1oL-0007zm-Hx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:27:58 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5LCOUPX001599; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:24:30 GMT Received: from ox1.ios.ac.cn (ox1.ios.ac.cn [159.226.5.151]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5LC7uCj001142 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:07:57 GMT Received: from lp.ios.ac.cn ([159.226.5.164]) (authenticated bits=0) by ox1.ios.ac.cn (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k5LCHNaJ001900 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 20:17:23 +0800 Received: by lp.ios.ac.cn (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8BDD45C2AA; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 20:09:46 +0800 (CST) Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 20:09:46 +0800 From: Shaochun Wang To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage: missing pieces Message-ID: <20060621120945.GA8575@localhost> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <62b0912f0606210429t3dbd40dajc38cca3e446eac68@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <62b0912f0606210429t3dbd40dajc38cca3e446eac68@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-lcsios-MailScanner-OpenProtect: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-OpenProtect-MCPCheck: X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id k5LC7uCj001142 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id k5LCOUPo001599 X-Archives-Salt: 8ba31ce7-a4fe-4b81-8229-5aba9c3f183d X-Archives-Hash: 540853986127fd1d6d9b0a2f73aa7535 add virtual/xft ~x86 to /etc/portage/package.keywords On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 01:29:21PM +0200, Molle Bestefich wrote: > I think a piece might be missing from Portage. >=20 > I'll depict my workflow as an example. >=20 > I'm preparing to upgrade: > # emerge --sync > # emerge -Dp world > [blocks B ] <=3Dx11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking=20 > x11-libs/libXinerama-1.0.1) > [blocks B ] <=3Dx11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/libXi-1= .0.1) > [blocks B ] <=3Dx11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking=20 > x11-libs/libXrandr-1.1.1) > [blocks B ] <=3Dx11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking=20 > x11-proto/randrproto-1.1.2) > [blocks B ] <=3Dx11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking=20 > x11-misc/makedepend-1.0.0) > [blocks B ] <=3Dx11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking media-libs/mesa-= 6.5-r3) > [blocks B ] <=3Dx11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking x11-libs/libdrm-= 2.0.1) > [blocks B ] <=3Dx11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking > x11-proto/xf86vidmodeproto-2.2.2) > [blocks B ] <=3Dx11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking=20 > x11-proto/glproto-1.4.7) > [blocks B ] <=3Dx11-base/xorg-x11-6.9 (is blocking > x11-proto/xf86driproto-2.0.3) > ... etc, lots of blockers ... >=20 > Ok, let's try and find why it wants to downgrade to xorg-x11-6.9: > # equery d xorg-x11-6.9 > [ Searching for packages depending on xorg-x11-6.9... ] >=20 > > # >=20 > Ok, no reason, apparently. Maybe it's already merged then? > # emerge -C xorg-x11-6.9 > --- Couldn't find 'xorg-x11-6.9' to unmerge. >=20 > Nope. Now I'm getting uncertain. Don't I have xorg-x11 at all? > # emerge -C xorg-x11 >=20 > x11-base/xorg-x11 > selected: 7.0-r1 > protected: none > omitted: none >=20 > >>>'Selected' packages are slated for removal. > >>>'Protected' and 'omitted' packages will not be removed. >=20 > >>>Waiting 5 seconds before starting... > >>>(Control-C to abort)... > >>>Unmerging in: 5 4 3 >=20 > > Exiting on signal 2 >=20 > Whoops. Yep, it's there. >=20 > Ok, so status is that I have xorg-x11-7.0, I don't have 6.9, no > packages actually wants xorg-x11-6.9, but whenever I use "emerge -D > world", Portage sees it as a blocker anyway. >=20 > Is there a piece missing in this puzzle, in particular the one that > will tell me why on earth Portage thinks version 6.9 is a blocker? >=20 > Or is the piece in place but I'm not looking hard enough? > --=20 > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list --=20 Shaochun Wang(=CD=F5=C9=DC=B4=BA) PH.D Candidate Laboratory of Computer Science, Institute of Software Chinese Academy of Science --=20 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list